Is there some project that the opensource world is missing that you think it needs?

  • whatwemadeourselves@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    A mesh network internet, it’s more of a hardware, security, and adoption problem but at this point there’s enough wifi overlap in most residential areas that entire towns could have their own local internet without needing the ISP model at all.

  • Zeoic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    A manga chapter/volume manager similar to sonarr/radarr/readarr that can download with or similar to fmd2/hdoujin downloader/mihon

  • badcodecat@lemux.minnix.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    games! in maybe 95% of cases you can find an open alternative to some (non-game) software, but with games it’s the opposite.

    i would say that the main proprietary softwares i still use, are video games

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Nothing and everything.

    There are thousands if not millions of open source solutions scattered around society. Some are feature complete, most are not. Some are maintained, many are not. A handful are funded, the rest is not.

    What open source needs, more than anything else is fundraising and the means to distribute those funds to the tune of the trillions of dollars that the corporate world extracts in profits from those open source efforts.

    In other words, the people who make this need to get paid.

    Firefox terms and conditions, Red Hat, and several other projects that have caused uproar through the community, are all caused by the need to get paid to eat food and have a roof over your head whilst you contribute to society and give away your efforts.

    • lordnikon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I 100% agree with this what we need is a centralized store like steam that is a non-profit. Where they make it easy just to buy the software. I love distros as much as the next person but having it centralized between all distros gets people paid. My only concern is how do we get the devs of libraries used by those apps use paid. And yes i know it sounds crazy it’s open source how can you charge? Nothing in free and open source says you have to not charge. You just have to given them the source when you do so.

      Even if someone can build it themselves for free. If you make the store a great experience to use. People will just buy. It’s likely this i can go out and pirate any games I want. So from a monetary perspective it’s the same. With a little work I could have my games for free but steam is so good i just buy the game.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I know micropayments is a bad word, but a centralized nonprofit where I could pay 50$ a month to distribute amongst projects I use and their dependencies would be great. Disregarding any privacy concerns of course, as they would have to track all or most of the applications I use and for how long.

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah the problem with that model is the overhead to pick who gets the money would cut in to much. My thought is you want it you buy it. They could do it like humble bundle and have a slider to pay more if you want.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Only Android Open Source Project, not the different phone UIs, vendor blobs, firmware, camera apps, etc… It is really the basics that are open source.

        But also the source of android is 100% controlled by google unless it is an alternative forked project like lineageOS (at least I think so)

      • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s not untrue but phones are complex, requiring lots of components and drivers to work together, so it’s hard to get a fully free phone.

        • whatwemadeourselves@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          If we started with a very basic, touch tone phone and worked from there it might be doable. Seems to me the hard part is breaking through the FCC/Cell company monopoly, so just focusing on how to contact a cell tower and make a voice phone call would be the key.

  • starshipwinepineapple@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It you’re looking for ideas-- Something you’re passionate about. Find a problem you’re having, fix it, and make it open source. That’s the best way to make sure whatever you do doesn’t get abandoned. Good luck

  • Flagstaff@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I’ve been wanting to try to leave Windows for Linux, but I just can’t find a replacement for AutoHotkey that can do everything that it can. It would have to be some kind of weird combination of various Python libraries, AutoKey, and Espanso, and even then it’s either not as easy or downright convoluted at best.

    I also can’t find any FOSS image editor that can do this.