wagesj45

I didn’t think that holds muster either. It could mean many different things, even in context. The bar for true threats in the US is very high, as it should be. They clearly wanted to make an example of her to nip this class consciousness in the bud, and our legal system is certainly prone to bad decisions and practices, but in theory I can’t see this passing that high bar.

Yes, actually, I am. This is nowhere near an actionable threat and arresting her over it is insanity and should be criminal itself.

“experts” lol

RFK Jr. is nominated for head of Health and Human Services, which is above the CDC.

Lucky

Well, we do have some private companies that are doing things like this, such as Meta with its Llama models and Google with their smaller gemma models. But I would love for there to be some publicly funded options that truly belong to all of us.

This is awesome. Wish the USA could do stuff like this.

You mean there’s no chance that Wal-Mart might choose to absorb the increased prices out of the goodness of their hearts? :o

The chief executive of the US has been a Democrat for 4 years, and it was absolutely their responsibility to prosecute (or ensure prosecution happens to) anyone that broke the law, or to at least protect the country. The norm has been for Presidents to maintain a firewall between themselves and prosecutorial decisions, but that’s not constitutionally mandated as far as I can tell.

This is the Wario version of the Interstate Compact.