That was long? Oh.

I like the meme because of so many reasons.

Let’s start with, if I am not misinformed, technically 21% of the levers could win against the rest of levers. Let’s ignore the fact that those 21% levers are historically generally in favor of more genocide. And let’s assume those 21% levers all go for third parties. Then they would still probably lose because they haven’t voted for the same third party. So let’s say those 21% are all committed to the cause and vote for the same party. In 2020, the biggest third party got 1.18%. but let’s assume all previous third party voter unite and then there would be 1.72% third party voters. Now obviously those aren’t part of the relevant 21% that we have been talking about but let’s act as if. Now only 19.28% of all voter need to change their vote to third party. That are only 29 884 000 voters. Believe!

What debate? Have you addressed my first comment to your first comment? No. Have you addressed my second comment to you talking to me without talking about anything related to what I said? No. Have you addressed my third comment about you talking to me as if we had a conversation while you haven’t said anything addressing anything that was a response to what I said? No.

And I am not making an effort to make any kind of point? Dude you are talking to no one!

Wait, he was running? Did someone care? Like did he have any realistic change that anyone would like him to get through the primaries? I mean he certainly didn’t have the chance to get through them but maybe he had like 1 Supporter somewhere or something

Still talking to someone else?

I mean, why concession? It makes it sound like I said it wasn’t “all that good”, after expressing that it was. I did neither. You are really talking to someone else. Who is it? And why respond to my message instead of theirs?

Or did you mistake my summarization of your vaguely stated opinion on a very big multifaceted issue, as me expressing support for your “fire bad” take?

I like that you jump on a long rant over hierarchy and the unavoidability of it. Then rant over socialism how it is there is a hierarchy but people deny it. To quote me and act like my point was that hierarchy is tyrannical.

I am not sure who you are talking to but I hope you are enjoying yourself.

Sidenote, you are talking about property law systems, not a whole political system, remember that.

Who wouldn’t be?

I hate when people talk about system like capitalism and communism is so simplistic terms.

I mean this is about as vague and reasonable as “a man stole a Softdrink from the supermarket. Every man is a thief”

Are you a bot? If yes, nice bot.

This format is so cringe.

First of all, there are people who think it is funny, like me.

Additionally, sometimes people just aren’t aware of stuff and people draw different lines. Apparently trump support has decreased since the verdict of his 34 felonies. That wasn’t my line for sure; the racism and history of racism was; but apparently some people didn’t care about the racism, transphobia, sexism, the sexualizing of his daughter, the cheating on his wife, the lies, … But about the felonies. So instead of telling people to not speak out about it, don’t engage.

That is a strange question. If you use any service to consume media, the service has a huge influence on what information you receive. It is a common complaint over media. Using a service which is under control of someone who doesn’t have your best interest in mind, is giving power over your media consumption to that actor. Which is bad. That is why you should care about who e.h. owns and controls the Washington Post.

Now, about TikTok… Well think about it.

For those horrible enough to like this.

Sometimes each other too if my information is correct. So even if you are a bad person and want to harass innocent people, kiwi farms isn’t the place to be.

Bad people are bad people towards you too if you give them the chance. Just don’t be bad, much better. Don’t hate!

I know an easy fix. Just don’t do ai.

I think you are very unfair in how you paint the picture. Biden shouldn’t support genocide, obviously. But realistically, you have to choose between 2 genocide supporters. And “stopping trump” is a good reason to vote for 1 genocide supporter over the other. Obviously you don’t like the genocide supporters and you shouldn’t be forced to choose one but you are living in a (practically) 2 party system and both run a genocide supporter.

I can’t test it right now but I would love to know. Is it true?