I wonder if my system is good or bad. My server needs 0.1kWh.

  • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    For the whole month of November. 60kWh. This is for all my servers and network equipment. On average, it draws around 90 watt.

  • Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use unraid with 5950x and it wouldn’t stop crashing until I disabled c states

    So that plus 18 hdds and 2 ssds it sits at 200watts 24/7

    • overload@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      I was really confused by that and that the decided units weren’t just in W (0.1 kW is pretty weird even)

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Idles at around 24W. It’s amazing that your server only needs .1kWh once and keeps on working. You should get some physicists to take a look at it, you might just have found perpetual motion.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Running an old 7th gen Intel, It has a 2017 and a 1080 in it, six mechanical hard drives 3 SSDs. Then I have an eighth gen laptop with a 1070 TI mobile. But the laptops a camera server so it’s always running balls to the wall. Running a unified dream machine pro, 24 port poe, 16 port poe and an 8 port poe

    Because of the overall workload and the age of the CPU, it burns about 360 watts continuous.

    I can save a few wants by putting the discs to sleep, But I’m in the camp where the spin up and spin down of the discs cost more wear than continuous running.

  • computergeek125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    My server rack has

    • 3x Dell R730
    • 1x Dell R720
    • 2x Cisco Catalyst 3750x (IP Routing license)
    • 2x Netgear M4300-12x12f
    • 1x Unifi USW-48-Pro
    • 1x USW-Agg
    • 3x Framework 11th Gen (future cluster)
    • 1x Protectli FE4B

    All together that draws… 0.1 kWh… in 0.327s.

    In real time terms, measured at the UPS, I have a running stable state load of 900-1100w depending on what I have at load. I call it my computationally efficient space heater because it generates more heat than is required for my apartment in winter except for the coldest of days. It has a dedicated 120v 15A circuit

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      That’s pretty low with 4 HDD’s. One of my servers use 30 watts. Half of that is from the 2 HDD’s in it.

      • Andres Salomon@social.ridetrans.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        @meldrik @qaz I’ve got a bunch of older, smaller drives, and as they fail I’m slowly transitioning to much more efficient (and larger) HGST helium drives. I don’t have measurements, but anecdotally a dual-drive USB dock with crappy 1.5A power adapter (so 18W) couldn’t handle spinning up two older drives but could handle two HGST drives.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Around 18-20 Watts on idle. It can go up to about 40 W at 100% load.

    I have a Intel N100, I’m really happy about performance per watt, to be honest.

    • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Computer with gpu and 50TB drives. I will measure the computer on its own in the enxt couple of days to see where the power consumption comes from

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Which GPU? How many drives?

        Put a kill-o-watt meter on it and see what it says for consumption.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You are misunderstanding the confusion, Kwh is an absolute measurement of an amount of power, not a rate of power usage. It’s like being asked how fast your car can go and answering it can go 500 miles. 500 miles per hour? Per day? Per tank? It doesn’t make sense as an answer.

        Does your computer use 100 watt hours per hour? Translating to an average of 100 watts power usage? Or 100 watt hours per day maybe meaning an average power use of about 4 watts? One of those is certainly more likely but both are possible depending on your application and load.

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You’re adding to the confusion.
          kWh (as in kW*h) and not kW/h is for measurement of energy.
          Watt is for measurement of power.

          • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Lol thank you, I knew that I don’t know why I wrote it that way, in my defense it was like 4 in the morning.

  • bier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    My whole setup including 2 PIs and one fully speced out AM4 system with 100TB of drives a Intel Arc and 4x 32gb ecc ram uses between 280W - 420W I live in Germany and pay 25ct per KWh and my whole apartment uses 600w at any given time and approximately 15kwh per day 😭

  • MentalEdge@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    You might have your units confused.

    0.1kWh over how much time? Per day? Per hour? Per week?

    Watthours refer to total power used to do something, from a starting point to an ending point. It makes no sense to say that a device needs a certain amount of Wh, unless you’re talking about something like charging a battery to full.

    Power being used by a device, (like a computer) is just watts.

    Think of the difference between speed and distance. Watts is how fast power is being used, watt-hours is how much has been used, or will be used.

    If you have a 500 watt PC, for example, it uses 500Wh, per hour. Or 12kWh in a day.

    • cholesterol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If you have a 500 watt PC, for example, it uses 500Wh, per hour. Or 12kWh in a day.

      A maximum of 500 watts. Fortunately your PC doesn’t actually max out your PSU or your system would crash.

    • fool@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I forgive 'em cuz watt hours are a disgusting unit in general

      idea what unit
      speed change in position over time meters per second m/s
      acceleration change in speed over time meters per second, per second m/s/s=m/s²
      force acceleration applied to each of unit of mass kg * m/s²
      work acceleration applied along a distance, which transfers energy kg * m/s² * m = kg * m²/s²
      power work over time kg * m² / s³
      energy expenditure power level during units of time (kg * m² / s³) * s = kg * m²/s²

      Work over time, × time, is just work! kWh are just joules (J) with extra steps! Screw kWh, I will die on this hill!!! Raaah

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Power over time could be interpreted as power/time. Power x time isn’t power, it’s energy (=== work). But otherwise I’m with you. Joules or gtfo.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Could be worse, could be BTU. And some people still use tons (of heating/cooling).

  • elmicha@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Do you mean 0.1kWh per hour, so 0.1kW or 100W?

    My N100 server needs about 11W.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The N100 is such a little powerhouse and I’m sad they haven’t managed to produce anything better. All of the “upgrades” are either just not enough of an upgrade for the money, it just more power hungry.

      • d_k_bo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        It’s the other way around. 0.1 kWh means 0.1 kW times 1 h. So if your device draws 0.1 kW (100 W) of power for an hour, it consumes 0.1 kWh of energy. If your device factory draws 360 000 W for a second, it consumes the same amount of 0.1 kWh of energy.

        • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Thank you for explaining it.

          My computer uses 1kwh per hour.

          It does not yet make sense to me. It just feels wrong. I understand that you may normalize 4W in 15 minutes to 16Wh because it would use 16W per hour if it would run that long.

          Why can’t you simply assume that I mean 1kWh per hour when I say 1kWh? And not 1kWh per 15 minutes.

          • 486@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            kWh is a unit of power consumed. It doesn’t say anything about time and you can’t assume any time period. That wouldn’t make any sense. If you want to say how much power a device consumes, just state how many watts (W) it draws.

      • elmicha@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        0.1kWh per hour can be written as 0.1kWh/h, which is the same as 0.1kW.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    last I checked with a kill-a-watt I was drawing an average of 2.5kWh after a week of monitoring my whole rack. that was about three years ago and the following was running in my rack.

    • r610 dual 1kw PSU
    • homebuilt server Gigabyte 750w PSU
    • homebuilt Asus gaming rig 650w PSU
    • homebuilt Asus retro(xp) gaming/testing rig 350w PSU
    • HP laptop as dev env/warmsite ~ 200w PSU
    • Amcrest NVR 80w (I guess?)
    • HP T610 65w PSU
    • Terramaster F5-422 90w PSU
    • TP-Link TL-SG2424P 180w PSU
    • Brocade ICX6610-48P-E dual dual 1kw PSU
    • Misc routers, rpis, poe aps, modems(cable & 5G) ~ 700w combined (cameras not included, brocade powers them directly)

    I also have two battery systems split between high priority and low priority infrastructure.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I was drawing an average of 2.5kWh after a week of monitoring my whole rack

      That doesn’t seem right; that’s only ~18W. Each one of those systems alone will exceed that at idle running 24/7. I’d expect 1-2 orders of magnitude more.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        would love to add more fiber to my diet! if I had the time and money. next four years is going to get pricy so I’m solidifying my stack now with backup hardware and planning for failures.

        the brocade is running my pvt lan since it’s the most important. physically cut off public access. just upgraded most my servers to use 10gbe and would love to run fiber to my office about 60-70 feet away.

        the brocade I’m using was unlocked by the eBay seller I got it from, so it can theoretically transfer up to 40g. would be great for my AI rig I keep in the office.

  • mtoboggan@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Idle: 30 Watts

    Starting all docker containers after reboot: 140 Watts

    It needs around 28 kWh per month.