They’ve charged Brian Thompson with terrorism for what he did - or at least caused - to tens of thousands of people each year?
Finally they start to make sense!

Doesn’t he at least have concepts of a plan for that?

The percentage of ‘prepared to support’ went slightly down from 56%to 54%, which is 2 percentage points or around 4%.
The percentage of ‘not prepared to support’ went up from 36% to 41%, which is 5 percentage points or around 14%.
The numbers are still kind of unbelievable, but at least the trend points into the right direction.
Well, isn’t Trump the one who loves the poorly educated?
Although he is dumb as fuck, he understood that part.

In my opinion Elon is worth shit, but I’m no native speaker, hence I might be confused by the phrase.

Ah, so basically next to the freeze peach; got it :)

I often have conversations with myself, just not using online platforms with different accounts.

Going from PoW to PoS and reducing the overall ecological (and economical) footprint by doing so was a great win for Ethereum and the planet.
This eludes stubborn haters and why wouldn’t it, if their key characterisicts are ‘stubborn’ and ‘hater’.

No, we aren’t.
Stop your false accusations and threats already!

These facts of nature don’t extend to what you call ‘crypto bros’, because they’re not that part of nature you insinuate they are.

Oh, I do like the sea, the waves, the beach.
What I don’t like so much is people trying to force their (imho) limited perspective on others.
So please go on hating crypto unaware that you basically just hate Bitcoin (and potentially other crypto involving mining) - at least that can be derived from your recent comments - but leave me out of it.
If you can’t deal with having easily falsified a statement of yours, that had no merit in the first place, you might consider refraining from making such statements.
Have fun!

Well, you could try to see things as differently as they are. While I agree that PoW aka ‘mining’ is bad (e.g. for the environment) and there are a gazillion of scams out there, that doesn’t mean that each and every crypto is bad.

I do.
Your claim has been falsified.

I might.
That doesn’t necessarily prove it was meant this way and because we’re talking potential criminal offense it has to be proven it was meant as a threat if I’m not mistaken.

In all honesty it can be perceived as them being next in getting their claim denied and not only as the threat it as well be perceived.
It’s so very close to Delay, Deny, Defend: Why Insurance Companies Don’t Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It that it could as well be a misunderstanding as a threat.

Was it even the majority of voters?
https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS/zjpqnemxwvx/
Anyway, it still went horribly wrong.

And here I thought Luigi is just a suspect and innocent until proven guilty. But what do I know.

You’re righr. I wasn’t specific enough. I meant inflation of the supply, the currency units. Increasing the supply can cause loss of real purchase power aka inflation.
With a stable supply and only the forces of supply and demand in place, real purchase power loss or increase are possible, which means there can be inflation or deflation.

You’re dead wrong.
Have you ever heard of Bitcoin mining farms? Their electric energy consumption dwarfs a league of mainframes.
Am IBM Z16 may need several dozen kW at full load: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/systems-hardware/zsystems/Z16M-A01?topic=requirements-general-electrical-power
Fully equipped with 8 PDUs and 4 BPAs a single mainframe is limited to an electric power of 173 kW.

Well, the Bitcoin miners are estimated to use around 175 TWh of energy annually, which equals an electric power of around 20 GW : https://www.statista.com/statistics/881472/worldwide-bitcoin-energy-consumption/
This is several orders of magnitude above that of all the mainframes in the world - unless there are more than 116 million mainframes of that type in operation and running at full load.

But unless you use Monero or other crypto with similarly strong privacy all you do is leave a permanent trail for agencies to investigate.
Using shell companies on the Cayman Islands might be the safer approach.

…and the hate is strong.