• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    My only problem with this is that Geordi made it clear more than once that not only would he rather just be able to see, but that his VISOR caused him constant pain. I wouldn’t really call that accommodating for his blindness if that’s what was required to get into Starfleet later.

    And, of course, that was what made it so impactful when he finally had eyes that worked.

    And then there was Melora on DS9. Starfleet could have done so many things to fulfill her dream of traveling the stars without having her be stuck in the chair in near-1g environments or accept Bashir’s treatments. In fact, the only reason so few Elaysians ever left their homeworld was that everyone else was fine with 1g and no one gave a shit about their needs.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Geordi made it clear more than once that not only would he rather just be able to see, but that his VISOR caused him constant pain

      it was also suggested that his visor was “superior to human eyes”. star trek is habitually inconsistent about its world and sometimes it is better not to think about it too much.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t think that’s contradictory at all though.

        Geordi wanted to be able to see [naturally], but his visor is superior to human eyes in that it can see things that humans can’t naturally see.

        To put it a different way: a person with advanced bionic legs that never tire, could run far faster than any natural human, and bend in ways that human legs can’t, would have superior legs. But there wouldn’t be anything wrong with their stance if they said “yeah but I just want normal human legs”.

        • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t think that’s contradictory at all though.

          Geordi wanted to be able to see [naturally], but his visor is superior to human eyes in that it can see things that humans can’t naturally see.

          we are nitpicking here, but if i amputate your hand and stitch can opener at its end, you can now do something normal human hand cannot, but i don’t think anyone would call that superior, or prefer it to their own hand.

          if geordi decided that after considering all factors, he would rather have normal eyes, then that is definition of “not superior” to me.

          and just a reminder that this is the extraordinary experience we are talking about. i am definitely choosing my eyes 😆

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean a can opener is very different, no? Or at least it is when I try to put myself in those shoes.

            A can opener can open cans but nothing more. Sure you gain one piece of functionality, but you lose others.

            Geordi’s visor was a bit different in that he could see the visible light spectrum, but also a bunch of other stuff.

            • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              bit different in that he could see the visible light spectrum

              he could not: https://i.imgur.com/dlVpyIo.mp4

              would you want to see like that? i mean if you were born blind and this was your only option, it is definitely better than nothing, but other than that, it is hard no from me.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                That’s a visual representation, in the visible light spectrum, of what he sees. He would see it differently than what appears on the viewscreen.

                There’s also nothing there that shows or says he can’t see the visible light spectrum.

                • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  There’s also nothing there that shows or says he can’t see the visible light spectrum.

                  there is, it is exactly there on the screen, his perception of visible spectrum is just one step above nothing. would you want to see like that? accompanied by occasional technical problems and pain? would you call that superior to your eyes?

                  He would see it differently than what appears on the viewscreen.

                  that is just unfounded assumption, if you want to argue like that, you can make up literally anything and the discussion loses sense (not that the level of sense was very high anyway 😆)

                  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    But that’s not how he sees, or how any of this works 🤦

                    Things that see stuff in the (to us) non-visible spectrum don’t see it in the visible light spectrum.

                    An insect that sees ultraviolet light doesn’t see it how we see it when we apply a camera filter to view it. That’s just the camera shifting it to our visible light spectrum, because we can’t see ultraviolet.

                    A screen showing an image in ultraviolet light would not be usable to us.

                    The viewscreen Picard was looking at wasn’t magically adding cones to his eyes and allowing him to see a wider range of the light spectrum. It was showing a representation in the visible light spectrum of what the visor can detect.