• 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t think that’s contradictory at all though.

    Geordi wanted to be able to see [naturally], but his visor is superior to human eyes in that it can see things that humans can’t naturally see.

    we are nitpicking here, but if i amputate your hand and stitch can opener at its end, you can now do something normal human hand cannot, but i don’t think anyone would call that superior, or prefer it to their own hand.

    if geordi decided that after considering all factors, he would rather have normal eyes, then that is definition of “not superior” to me.

    and just a reminder that this is the extraordinary experience we are talking about. i am definitely choosing my eyes 😆

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I mean a can opener is very different, no? Or at least it is when I try to put myself in those shoes.

      A can opener can open cans but nothing more. Sure you gain one piece of functionality, but you lose others.

      Geordi’s visor was a bit different in that he could see the visible light spectrum, but also a bunch of other stuff.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        bit different in that he could see the visible light spectrum

        he could not: https://i.imgur.com/dlVpyIo.mp4

        would you want to see like that? i mean if you were born blind and this was your only option, it is definitely better than nothing, but other than that, it is hard no from me.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          That’s a visual representation, in the visible light spectrum, of what he sees. He would see it differently than what appears on the viewscreen.

          There’s also nothing there that shows or says he can’t see the visible light spectrum.

          • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            There’s also nothing there that shows or says he can’t see the visible light spectrum.

            there is, it is exactly there on the screen, his perception of visible spectrum is just one step above nothing. would you want to see like that? accompanied by occasional technical problems and pain? would you call that superior to your eyes?

            He would see it differently than what appears on the viewscreen.

            that is just unfounded assumption, if you want to argue like that, you can make up literally anything and the discussion loses sense (not that the level of sense was very high anyway 😆)

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              But that’s not how he sees, or how any of this works 🤦

              Things that see stuff in the (to us) non-visible spectrum don’t see it in the visible light spectrum.

              An insect that sees ultraviolet light doesn’t see it how we see it when we apply a camera filter to view it. That’s just the camera shifting it to our visible light spectrum, because we can’t see ultraviolet.

              A screen showing an image in ultraviolet light would not be usable to us.

              The viewscreen Picard was looking at wasn’t magically adding cones to his eyes and allowing him to see a wider range of the light spectrum. It was showing a representation in the visible light spectrum of what the visor can detect.