• Daxtron2@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh sorry we’re going to have to triple your rates. What? No not for anyone else just you. Nothing to do with your feedback though, we value that!

      • sudo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which is to say

        depending on jurisdiction they can just arbitrarily raise rates

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re not allowed to but they definitely can. They’ll probably get away with it unpunished too, the American “justice” system being what it is…

        • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s not just the US. I had issues with my supplier a couple of years ago where they randomly changed the supply address of my account then opened additional accounts in my name without informing me or asking for consent, and after I called them to sort their shit they added a random over 2 grand charge to my account and expected me to pay my neighbour’s bill for some reason. I ended up with around 15 calls to them where every time they claimed to be confused how that could have happened and promised an immediate fix which never materialised.

          When I was finally able to raise a complaint with the ombudsman the supplier didn’t even bother to respond. For all that blatant fraud they got a slap on the wrist. Their only penalty was that they had to credit a tiny amount to my account (I think it was ~£100) and remove the other fraudulent charges and accounts.

          The worst part is I know for a fact they’re pulling that shit with people unable or unwilling to fight back. I dread to think how much of their profit is from just straight-up scamming people.

  • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Would be nice if we could unfuck the US, also if we could take a bit of money from the military to get heat pumps and induction stoves, and just skip the gas

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I agree on the gas for health reasons.

      I really want an outdoor wok burner, because my induction stove just doesn’t get hot enough. I’m used to working with a professional stove that will go up to 700° F. The induction stove won’t get my wok above 500° F.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have questions. They specifically say that once available it will run on a 120w or standard outlet, or low power 220w outlet. I don’t know that it would be possible to hit 700° F without a high power 220 outlet.

          • dignick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It charges its internal battery from whatever supply you have over the course of a day, then when you are cooking it can operate off the battery alone. So it doesn’t really matter how good your supply is because most home users won’t be cooking all day, so it will charge its battery slowly.

            It has a 3kwh battery, I’m not sure how powerful the inverter is and it depends on supply but it might take an hour or two to charge from flat.

            But it probably couldn’t maintain 700F for an extended period of time. I guess most people won’t need that heat for a long time.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ohio separates distribution from supply. You can’t select the distributor who connects your home to the gas mains, but you can choose from dozens of suppliers who put gas into those mains.

    We do the same with electricity.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same in the EU. Or at least I think so, it’s the case over here and it’s EU-wide for electricity providers. Water, sewage and garbage disposal are municipal responsibility though there’s no network/provider separation there.

      What’s actually missing is a municipal-level telecom monopoly – again, with separate providers. The last-mile network is just as much a natural monopoly for telecom as it is for other wires or pipes.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        it’s the case over here and it’s EU-wide for electricity providers

        I find it interesting that this is a good thing in the US and most of Europe, but in France this majorly fucked our electricity market by forcing the (mostly) state funded electricity producer into selling their electricity to some companies that provide no value aside from being an intermediate between the producer and the consumer (they are not required to produce their own electricity to buy some from EDF at a discount, and they are even allowed to sell it to consumers for less money than the lowest price EDF is allowed to charge when they are doing the same thing, because of some dumb regulations I can’t remember).

        All in the name of the free market because “monopoly bad”, even though electricity production and especially distribution is, as you said, a natural monopoly.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah you can’t combine a market mechanism while telling a production (quasi-)monopolist that they need to fix prices.

          Reminds me of the good ole GDR: They would subsidise bread so that people could always afford it, a completely laudable goal. People also had chickens in their backyard because eggs and meat and when it came to feeding those chickens, they had a look at the prices – and, yeah, the state subsidised bread. Not grain. So they fed the chickens bread as it was cheaper. It’s an easy enough fix, just shift the subsidies but nope, governmental inertia or something prevented them from doing it.