4·
1 day agoHaha, or a Hitchcock Presents episode.
turtle [he/him]
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
Cake day: September 11th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
4·1 day agoI see, thanks for the clarification! I thought you were referring to the actual manifesto, and I was going to point out that the supposed real one didn’t mention guns at all, but if I recall correctly the fake one did. So never mind me.
4·1 day agoShe lost the
firstonly primary.
She lost the
firstonly primary.
4·1 day agoThat said, while they probably want to be able to paint him as a terrorist, that necessarily involves a more detailed look at what he was trying to accomplish, and that might just backfire on the prosecution. It only takes one sympathetic juror to block a guilty verdict.
This is a really good insight, thanks!
Huh, what are the chances that his son pushed him off to get the inheritance?
As for sanity, gun arguments aside, the manifesto isn’t unhinged.
Just curious, what do you mean by “gun arguments aside”?
1·6 days agodeleted by creator
1·7 days agoMaybe I’m misunderstanding the post from @megopie@beehaw.org too? They seemed to be criticizing this plastics control agreement so I was countering that idea. On repeat readings, it still seems ambiguous.
That’s fair. I did misinterpret the article and didn’t notice the date, so I’ve deleted my post.
The profitability and market viability of fossil fuels depends pretty heavily on plastics production as a way of profitably disposing of byproducts. Take that away and they’re much less competitive with other energy sources.
Reducing fossil fuel extraction is something we need to do though. Regardless, the agreement is not talking about eliminating plastics completely but regulating their production. If you wanted to address what you described, couldn’t they regulate it so plastics are used for more durable things, like plastic lumber, car parts, furniture, etc. instead of all the endless disposable stuff?
13·8 days agoThis one is fake. The (supposedly) real one has now been published by Ken Klippenstein, and is linked in another comment on this thread.
41·9 days agoIf you trust them after having enforced an unwritten policy and still not allowing discussion of something that’s perfectly legal.
It seems that it was never written in their terms before and had been inconsistently applied, but just in case you hadn’t seen these:
Careful, in case you haven’t heard, discussing jury nullification is apparently against the rules of lemmy.world. SMH (at lemmy.world admins).
Google trends in US for jury nullification over last 30 days…
Oh, I think that’s the real one. Really short, only mentions CAD instead of actually printing the gun, and refers to Moore who can explain things better.