Jummy roof rabbit

I’m so jealoaf

I think we have a different approach to the same problem

All of this is exhausting. But so is dealing with humans who refuse to spend 30 seconds asking themselves what the consequences of a thing are

From my point of view: that’s going to remain. Any animal does so, human not excluded. Human’s can’t even stop war, something 99% of the population agree is a bad idea.

The headline is eye-catching, but what does it mean for us in 20 years if this were widely adopted.

Will it even be widely adopted? Chance is small. If it is widely adopted, are the consequences better than the status quo? Hopefully yes? I haven’t investigated the manufacturing process to detail.

Is that the goal? I’m not sure that’s even possible. You’d have to construct everything from the chemically inert like noble gasses. Yet by the very nature of them, they’re hard to construct anything out of. Ceramics, I think, is the better material? Although they still last centuries.

So I’m confused what your utopia looks like?

Yeah fine by me. We’ve had that for a decade now where I live.

Has had no measureable impact on ocean plastics.

What is AI, according to you?

It’s a marketing term, aimed to create a void. So I wonder what products you think fills this void.

I have seen endless reports like this from every news source, labs, you name it.

I’ve seen the same. We share this observation.

plastics have to be banned. Period.

Let’s phone the principal’s office and get plastics banned.

This is a news bulletin from RIKEN, a research center funded by the government of Japan.

This isn’t a story “pushed by the plastic industry”. The problem, I think, is that communication of scientific lab results is often overpraised (“It’s possible to do X!”).

It’s not wrong, but it also does not mean it’s always a good idea to do X, in the way it had been achieved in the paper.

Sadly, loud press releases does benefit funding. So it’ll continue to the detriment of your fatigue, and general distrust in r&d.

but surely we need more diversity than just the existing three to spur more development, right?

Ideally, of course. In practice, to me, it looks like it’s a very hard thing to do.

Don’t let that discourage you from taking on the endeavour though! I too would like another option!

If it were up to me, pyromania would be illegal

The default user experience maybe. Get better software, enjoy the better hardware.

There’s this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Ringbearer

Your BS radar has simply improved I’m guessing. Go through a few hype cycles, and you learn the pattern.

Hardware is better than ever. The default path in software is spammier and more extortionist than ever.

No worries, just sharing my interpretation.

I’m unfamiliar with your work, what’s the goal of it?

I’ve noticed that, instead of answering the question, this post poses different related questions and answers those.

Not quite my rethoric structure of choice.

No! R2D2 got lost in the stargate! Quickly, Spok, send in the troopers to save him from Lord Zedd!

Major sales, and continuing increase in sales, as well as in production of vehicles, and manufacturing, seems to happen in china (1).

In china EVs are a mass market product. In the western world it’s a luxury product, with tarrifs to keep it that way.

deleted by creator

I note that the first question was disregarded.

Goverments could enact laws that make teleportation mandatory. They don’t.

The only way to measure it is where it is produced.

How so? Airborn particles can be measured regardless of origin. Even satellite estimates are quite accurate.

Governments could reduce their emissions, especially in countries where they are high.

Again, placing blame.