For me it’s:

6 is half a dozen, so 6+6=12, then 7 is 6+1, so 6+7 is 12+1=13

127.0.0.1

Yeah but then like that person said, they will disassemble the trolley in a weird way and put back together two trolleys, one on each track.

Yes please!

My MATLAB colleagues were jealous of my Matplotlib because the company didn’t purchase the plotting add-on…

I don’t know about unbound so I can’t really compare… OpenNic is not run by for-profit corporations, which I think is a good thing.

Opennic should be the default DNS of everybody!

He smoked for pleasure. I’m sure he ate and drank for pleasure.

Hahaha i had a friend that always said “If i wait long enough, eventually someone will take charge and make choices, so I don’t have to!”

If it was not clearly identified, even if I see it, I’ll intentionally fall in it to have an OSHA-paid vacation.

Bring this rock close to this other rock, and voilà. It creates magic heat!

Don’t get too close, because it will curse you to an agonizing death years later. However you can use this to boil water and channel the power of thunderstorms.

I’d like to see the triangle grow two additional sides, becoming a 3-sided pyramid. Then, a fourth pops up, turning into a typical 4 sided one. But then, a fifth appears, then a sixth, then more and more untill it becomes a food cone

Then it flips over and gets filled with ice cream. There, the perfect food pyramid!

More info can be found here: https://old.atoptics.co.uk/rainbows/ord34.htm

He’ll just have to use the AC.

The only vegan people i know are the most lovely, smiling, and funny people. I only know they are vegans because insufferable conservatives are complaining about them being vegans.

Holy shit, gotta try it now…

Well that’s interesting: in order to define unmeasurable sets, you relied on the axiom of choice… I suppose it might be possible to define unmeasurable sets without AC, but maybe not!

Every time I encounter the axiom of choice implying a bunch of crazy stuff, it always loop back to requiring AC. It’s like a bunch of evidence against AC!

I find it interesting that the basic description of AC sounds very plausible, but I’m still convinced mathematicians might have made the wrong choice… (See what i did there? 😄)

Entropy and complexity are not quite the same thing.

Low entropy is every Lego pieces separated by color and size, high entropy is every Lego pieces mixed up together evenly. Complex creations correspond to medium entropy.

If you compute actions of living beings, you’ll realize it acts as a catalyst to increase entropy.

I have old college textbooks in my library, Cohen-Tannoudji. I’m not sure about online resources though…

That sounds super interesting!

It is! Although it only deals with the day-to-day working of electromagnetism (quantum electrodynamics), but this explains the working of everything in our current life apart from nuclear power station and fusion in the sun’s core.

The text was written before we developed the model for nuclear forces (strong and weak), so it doesn’t touch that subject. We know now that sound and weak interactions work in a very similar way to QED, with extension for notre charges.