They are the future.

Is this evopsych bullshit?

“This study shows us that bullying seems to be associated with some meaningful outcomes that help explain why kids do it,” Volk says. “This isn’t just ‘broken kids’ doing bad behavior; it’s getting them important things that matter.”

Yeah, same as bandits.

Volk says the results support the idea that adolescent bullying is, at least in part, an evolutionary adaptation that may help individuals pass on their genes to future generations.

Yep, evopsych bullshit.

I’m no medical doctor, but that perfusion looks bad (bottom images in reddish colors).

“When females were selecting mates, they also had to select males that had a similar tameness to themselves,” study co-author Alex Capaldi, a mathematician and statistician at James Madison University in Virginia, told Live Science. “So if both of those processes are in play, then it is possible for the self-domestication hypothesis to beat the time constraint critique.”

“Snax and chill.”

The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet | Nature

If we know that there are basically no alternatives, then we don’t have to waste time and misery chasing after each CEO and corporation in detail.

I hate it

It just means that the technological “level” has to come down, to simplify.

Here, some context:

https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/californian-ideology

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-acronym-behind-our-wildest-ai-dreams-and-nightmares/

https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y-erGt0LsU

https://thebaffler.com/latest/first-as-tragedy-then-as-fascism-amend

https://itsgoingdown.org/ecofascism-overpopulation-and-total-transformation/

Fascists want what they always want, action on conservative goals: “more for me, less for everyone else”, with an ambiguous and dynamic “me group” usually. Sometimes it’s just a family clan thing, and it can even be reduced to the “Sovereign Citizen” who’s doing a type of solo fascism (ancaps).

A shrinking environment means, for fascists & friends, fewer resources to use for themselves, thus a reason to take even more resources from others. It’s the prepper ideology at a large scale - survival of the fittest group by hoarding resources and killing the competition.

The techbro types have their own version of this, as mentioned above with the TESCREAL ideologies.

To summarize this in a different way, ecofascists look at the problem of overshoot (includes global warming) as “how to get rid of the competition in order to reduce the overall damage and thus achieve ‘sustainability’”.

If you’re familiar ideas like the Kaya identity then you understand the very basic: IMPACT = population size x average individual impact. Fascists love the high impact living (high consumption, lots of waste and pollution) and want to fix the impact problem by reducing the population size, not the nice lifestyle. This applies proportionally to the rich, the billionaires. Fascist narratives help to outline which population to reduce and which population to preserve (see: “the great replacement” conspiracy theory). This isn’t super precise, they constantly redefine groups and there’s, of course, a hierarchy or caste system aspect to it, since the rich and privileged depend on the poor and exploited. Techbros hope to achieve fully automated capitalism, so that they no longer depend on the masses. You can guess what happens if that happens.

I linked to the right thing, a great introduction to understanding how to change systems:

PLACES TO INTERVENE IN A SYSTEM

(in increasing order of effectiveness)

12. Constants, parameters, numbers (such as subsidies, taxes, standards).

11. The sizes of buffers and other stabilizing stocks, relative to their flows.

10. The structure of material stocks and flows (such as transport networks, population age structures).

9. The lengths of delays, relative to the rate of system change.

8. The strength of negative feedback loops, relative to the impacts they are trying to correct against.

7. The gain around driving positive feedback loops.

6. The structure of information flows (who does and does not have access to information).

5. The rules of the system (such as incentives, punishments, constraints).

4. The power to add, change, evolve, or self-organize system structure.

3. The goals of the system.

2. The mindset or paradigm out of which the system — its goals, structure, rules, delays, parameters — arises.

1. The power to transcend paradigms.

Regulations are important, but low(er) impact.

My point is that regulations are likely insufficient.

What we really need is a reduction in consumption. We need to stop living life as “dedicated waste manufacturers”.

Here’s a useful article to help get over the limits of regulations: https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/

just collecting and combusting at high temperatures

You mean GHG pollution.

They don’t actually have alternatives in the single-use realm. The result must be an end to it, bankruptcy from their perspective.

If we replace plastic containers with containers that are paper covered in PFAS and similar substances, we’re not solving the problems.

For plastic waste: plastic-eating fungi

It’s going to be fun when I have to spray my computer devices with fungicides.

Regulation

that’s extremely vague, what does the regulation do? Does it limit types of plastic? Uses of plastic? Production quantities? Waste allocations?

what’s the fix?

Bunkers are a scam. They’re fine for some occasional wildfire or flood, but not for climate chaos and all the damage that will do to society. Having a bunker just means you die later, perhaps after you eat your bunker mates, or they eat you. It’s not like they’ll “repopulate” after, climate change is going to go on long after 2100 and these inbred clowns will just inbreed more until they die off.

Ecofascism, like fascism, is a dead end. They just accelerate the destruction. The climate is global, nobody is going to escape climate chaos while remaining on this planet.

I don’t disagree with you, but the point is to not make more excuses for them. They need excuses because fascists hide monstrous intentions behind great PR. Don’t do their work for them.

let them fight…

Seems like they made “under construction”. It’s probably temporary.

Here’s a mirror: https://web.archive.org/web/20250214200832/https://therainbowspectator.wordpress.com/2025/02/12/common-tactics-of-the-alt-right/

Or you could read the article.