𝕯𝖎𝖕𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖙

This kills the hedgehog.

My issue with your theory here is that you are putting yourself as the author of the contract. This is the tactic conservatives use, by saying some stuff and expecting the reader to fill in the blanks with their own biases.

You: “social contract exists, you should respect the contract”

Me: “what are the rules of this contract? where can i read it?”

You: “you know the rules”

Ahh yes, the rules… That you should dip your balls in the toilet water to wash them off after pooping. C’mon man, everyone knows the rules. It’s right there in the contract.

Maybe some day they will make an infographic about how your way of thinking is better than others.

I understand the paradox of tolerance. This “social contract” stuff is BS, though.

“Social contract” is made up by people who don’t understand the paradox of tolerance. ITT: many of them

I never signed a social contract. Your argument is false.

It’s true, most people don’t care about money.

They care about what money can help them buy, like another day of survival.

It was never about the money. It was about maslovs heirarchy of needs; which, at the very bottom, is a foosball table.