Every peer reviewed study on it says between 14.5 and 19.6% is animal agriculture.
Every peer reviewed study on it says between 14.5 and 19.6% is animal agriculture.
While animal agriculture is responsible for 20% and eating plants directly instead of feeding them to animals first would use 75% less land which means we could grow forests at here that store carbon.
The original commenter here just conveniently ignored that though.
The political advocacy would (in the best case) still end up with a ban on these actions that disproportionately impact the climate so why not just start getting used to tofu already?
Which animals hands do you think you’d need to shake?
Then why do they kill and eat them
Sponsoring a conference is just buying an ad, not actually supporting anything
These are literally paid advertisements for the animal agriculture lobby.
Animal farming is a crime against nature, god and decency and we’re completely for that too, don’t forget
They need blood to procreate so the method in the post does exactly what you are asking for
Or the chickens you eat? They can’t even stand up out of their own feces
You watched 500 episodes in a couple months?
So pigs that go to heaven are still factory farmed and turned into hams?
Right now public institutions are paying for proprietary software. If they would invest the same money into FOSS, the FOSS option would not be behind proprietary software for long.