Cool then I will continue my development

Yeah Lemmy community is all about norms are, approval, and what’s socially allowed. I guess I think more like a CEO and see what’s legally allowed, allowed by the instance and rules. Ironically lemmy mods will ignore community rules and ban you even if you’re within scope of the rules.

But I have no idea how I changed my words to get people to agree with me. I’m trying to pry into people’s reasons as to how I should operate. Your reason are more important than my relationship to you

No idea what a social graph is meant to be, but people do shit post and meme even if people don’t desire it or if the meme is reference.

Of course idiot means anyone that uses Ai. I’m not portraying myself as groundbreaking even though I did make the fedi-plays genre

As a stien voter. I pretty much laugh at people that complain about Democrats loss. Yeah Democrats suck I don’t vote for them because I don’t want them to be legitimized. Also I push for approval voting system

It’s interesting that the deepseek AI can blend in. It made a post like it really visited a waterfall. It didn’t say anything too specific as to make it obvious it wasn’t there(maybe that the weather was good in this time of year in March). So it will require looking at multiple posts or maybe even interacting to spot the bot.

These boys can definitely blend in and then run script that can push an ideology. I won’t make more than 1 since I don’t have the resources

You can’t know any of that since you most likely haven’t interacted with the bot. Plus I don’t know “real option” is supposed to mean

Rn I’m supervising the response and iterating the prompt. I haven’t even implemented a scraper or api. I haven’t fully botted it yet because I don’t know the architecture I want. Like do I even want ai detector or a script that puts in grammar mistakes or an basic algorithm to pick prompts

I’ll give you some advice. It’s better to state why you don’t want me to test so at all. Asking questions just comes off as standoffish. Plus the way you phrases your question exposes that you have no intention of understanding me

I’ve heard of poisoning the well, but I don’t get what well I’m pissing into (no ones articulating anything). Yeah I admit I don’t care much on the counter AI measures. Idk why you’re essentially repeating what I’m saying. I intend to field test it (there’s no articulable reason not to). There’s no onus because no one has to make counter AI measures. It’s their choice.

Apparently I’m an idiot for developing essential human like entity.

I’m not burdening them. If they don’t want to take on the they project they don’t take it.

Actually I asked if there were any counter AI measures there probably is just no one knows what it is . In the post I’m referring too I explicitly said I’d make a human like bot and I’m saying the anti AI crowd should make a program to flag AI bots.

Now my project should help people that want to fight ai on the fediverse

So far I’ve experimented with ollama3.2 (I don’t have enough ram for 3.3). Deepseek r1 7b( discovered that it’s verbose and asks a lot of questions) and I’ll try phi4 later. I could use the chat-gpt models since I have tokens. Ironically I’m thinking about making a genetic algorithm of prompt templates and a confidence check. It’s oddly meta

Reddit is different than fediverse. They work on different principles and I argue fediverse is very libertarian.

Is there anyway you can rule out survivorship bias? Plus I’m already doing preliminary stuff and I looking into making response shorter so that there’s less information to go on and trying different models

That’s fine if people don’t want to deal with me I never interacted with them before this thread (most likely)

The lllm bot is meant to provide the function of flagging llm bots that operate on the fediverse.

I’m listening to you people but I’m not getting good reasons as to why I should do it in a certain way or even to not do it.

Reason does take precedent over request. Y’all are strangers to me and none of you are actually attempting to hear me out as I doing for you.

That doesn’t answer my question and it’s not coherent. Like I’m apparently “abusing resources” when I use a bot but not when I use a bot to make a leaderboard that tracks fediverse streamers stats or if I make the content with fleshy brain, just my resources.

Lol not the place for bot warfare 😆. That’s like saying America isn’t a place for class warfare and yet the rich already mobilized. Plus someone is probably doing the same thing as me and not disclosed it

I’m i can understand blocking 500 bots you think are garbage. I guess you can deal with the traffic of bots but not so much their content

There is and it’s propaganda. Even I knew ai has been used in propaganda for months now

How’s it unethical?