I really like this and will embrace it going forward. I have nothing to gain by engaging with nonsense.
I really like this and will embrace it going forward. I have nothing to gain by engaging with nonsense.
Uh… I’m the user at the top of the thread and I’m not confused at all, lol. I legitimately don’t think that the original Tumblr poster is attracted to women. That’s my opinion based off the post. I could very well be wrong, but that’s how it reads to me.
The person in the Tumblr image. It seems that there’s more going on there than whether or not the woman in the show is attractive.
I didn’t say that. I said they needed to denigrate other women to justify this woman’s attractiveness. I didn’t say there aren’t straight men who aren’t assholes about women.
Yeah, totalitarian states aren’t really fun for anybody in the end. It just devolves into a paranoid scheme and murder web for survival.
Nobody says all men’s bodies are beautiful, healthy, sexy, desirable, ect. Lol, they would immediately and rightfully be told to stfu.
I see, I do tend to forget the term is quite broad in its use dependant on time and place.
Conservatives never wanted civil rights or environmental protections. What alternate dimension did you drop out of?
Compassion through dispassionate application of the law, brilliant!
Naw, look at the actual cost of the fee they are complaining about and the total cost of the bill. If they want to get on America’s level, they need to get those numbers up. That’s rookie shit.
People have been bringing her up for years, but she is still not eligible. The president must be 35.
She was involved in the slave trade known as the “justice system” and proud of it. She’s one of them.
Lol, I suppose I’ll have to take your impassioned explanation of the finer details at face value as I haven’t seen the show, and I don’t know who any of these people are.
Yes, and? The writer brought up other women unprompted. Frankly, the whole post reflects rather poorly on the writer more than any of these supposed people they are railing against.
Overgeneralizing what? This post is clearly from the perspective of someone not attracted to women. Another dead giveaway is the fact that they have to denigrate other women to justify this woman’s attractiveness. The writing gives it all away quite clearly.
No, because they reduce a woman’s physical attractiveness to “big booba and I see some o’ dem!” That line of thinking is only ever heard from people who aren’t themselves attracted to women. Trust.
The change they should be supporting is “don’t.”
I’d bet dollars to donuts this person is not even sexually attracted to women.
And “whole milk” has about 3%. In either case, the fat is removed, then added back in.
At this point, I think we just need to have civil war 2.0 and get it over with. It will be horrific, but unfortunately, they fucked up reconstruction after the first go around. I really don’t see another way out of this.