• 24 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2024

help-circle



  • Eh, it’s not as bad as it sounds TBH. Paid reviewers would have ethical and economic pressures that hinder their effectiveness. Non-specialists in the same field would end up responsible for reviews of articles they are only rudimentarily familiar with (think astrophycisists working on exoplanet formation and composition having to review papers on black hole implications for dark energy. They ‘could’ but are not the best qualified to do so). Needing to review enough papers to earn a living means this dilution multiplied 100-fold to get enough done.

    With volunteering at least scientists that are interested in that paper’s topic, and hence are likely a specialist in it, are the ones looking at it and doing so at their leisure instead of needing to do 100 by weeks end to put food on their table.

    Personally, I think all privatization involved should be removed. Volunteer reviewers to public non-profit journals paid either by donations or tax dollars and freely accessible to all.



  • They are ‘representatives’. The US President or relevant diplomat literally speak for the country which is why the language is appropriate. Like it or not, your leader (and their delegates) speaks for you in an official capacity which is what that kind of dialogue describes. The extra specificity you desire is superfluous and actually subtracts from truly describing what is going on.

    Being awarded with a Medal of Honour by Biden? No. Biden isn’t giving you a datta-boy. The entire nation is expressing their gratitude. Is it fair that an entire nation gets marred by 1 individual’s buffoonery (exhibit A: Trump’s entire first term)? No. Accurate? Yes (see the next 4 years).










  • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.wintoScience Memes@mander.xyzProblem?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Whether we need to create a new system that is designed to catch fraud prior to publication is a whole different question

    That system already exists. It’s what replication studies are for. Whether we desperately need to massively bolster the amount of replication studies done is the question, and the answer is ‘yes’.









  • “We advance an alternative view: the modern airplane reflects a social microcosm of class-based society, making inequality salient to passengers through both the physical design of the plane (the presence of a first class cabin) and, more subtly, the boarding procedure (whether economy passengers must pass through the first class cabin),”

    So dysfunction on planes is a possible indicator people are ready to get violent in society as a whole due to its inequalities being made more obvious onboard. Really starting to think I’m going to see a NA revolution in my lifetime but I’ll be too old to ‘enjoy’ it.