Fascism is more of an approach than a specific ideology. Its only core value is Strength Through Unity - but to achieve that it needs some populist values to unite the people over - which is how you get different flavors of fascism. The original Fascist Party was using nationalism. Racism is also a popular choice (fascism + racism = Nazism), and it seems like rightist values are more prune to it - but leftist values are not safe either, like we have seen in the USSR which based its fascism around socialism.

Conservatism can be a base for fascism, but like all these other values - it doesn’t have to be fascist. The rule is simple:

• If you want The Gays™ to just stop - that’s regular conservatism.
• If you want a strong leader to “stop” The Gays™ - that’s fascist conservatism.

If you choose RC Cola, you get RC Cola. If picking a soft drink was like the elections, you wouldn’t want to choose RC because you’d still get Pepsi or Coke and you’ll just be throwing away your ability to influence it to be the one with the lower concentration of cyanide.

Now… Could they pass a lie detector for “do you promise you would never pay for your mistress to fly out of state for an abortion?“

They probably will, but when the time come they’ll manage to come up with the perfect excuse why their case is special and deserves an exemption.

Swords clash with other swords. Swords were always gay.

TBH this is quite mild on the Trump scale…

What do you mean by “improving”? This alarming warning appears because Firefox requires permissions. Let us look at the permissions listed there:

1. “User device access”. From the docs, I’d say the browser needs it for rendering?
2. “Download folder read/write access”. This one is obvious - the files you download with your browser go there.
3. “Can access some specific files”. This one, I’ll admit, is a bit cryptic - what files does it need to access? But this one is on Flatpak for making the permission so general.

App permissions should not be about “this app cannot be trusted because it asks for scary scary permissions”. They should be about “take a look at the list of permissions the app requests and determine whether or not it make sense for such an app to need such permissions”.

Controversial opinion: attempted murder is a serious deal regardless of whether or not it’s a hate crime.

Jokes like this are why people say the word “Nazi” has lost its meaning.

Nearly every app should have a warning

No. If you put a warning on every app (except for the most trivial ones that don’t actually do anything useful) then the warnings mean nothing. The become something more than ass-covering legal(ish) BS.

The humans’ bathroom.

it WILL cost lives

We’re going towards a dystopia…?

I mean…

Not with that kind of attitude!

\cdot master race. \times users should just use Microsoft Word (unless it’s for a Cartesian product or for cross product, of course)

I initially read it as “a fetish so false” and honestly I’m not sure which version is better.

A big part of the problem is that society as a whole took upon itself to ridicule these people are just aren’t meant to be loved.

The chances are exactly the same as getting any other random number

Which are also pretty small.

Travel is never a matter of money but of bidet.

You wanna be careful sharing that GIF.