I can’t answer your question, but I assume that “like” and “similar to” are neither like nor similar to each other
I can’t answer your question, but I assume that “like” and “similar to” are neither like nor similar to each other
Did you mean to cite a different paper? I looked it up, but I’m not sure what I was supposed to get from it.
“Collective trauma” ≠ “collective PTSD”
“Collective trauma” or “collective PTSD”? The latter is what we were discussing earlier in this thread. It has zero occurrences on Google Ngrams: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Collective+PTSD%2C+collective+trauma&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3
Sure, but PTSD is a specific disorder that individuals are diagnosed with. If a group of people are unable to work towards a single goal, saying they have “collective ADHD” is imprecise and potentially offensive to people with the diagnosis.
That said, I knew what you meant 🤷
Coming from someone who put their phone number in their username
E C M E T H R I BL S W
DRM = Direct Rendering Manager, in case anyone else was thinking Digital Rights Management…
MlT (MlT
): please accept this honorary PhD
I feel it is my pedantic duty to inform you that 99.9… is equal to 100.
Sexagenarian Clown Pussy
Venmo is owned by PayPal, so that might not solve anything
I would bet money they’ve been bitten by a human that meant it, too.
Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes
But what if you do both at the same time? Continuously…
Gray, duh
Y’all are grayblind
No, it would be some unspecified object that turns cat poop into fish. The function is 🐟 → 💩, so the inverse is 💩→ 🐟.