• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    I’ve never been a fan of tattoos. They look awful and, in the case of women distract from beauty, not add to it. That said, they can do whatever the hell they want. It’s not my body or problem and they ain’t hurting anyone.

    • joshthewaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      How do you think old people feel about all the actually old and saggy things? Our actual skin becomes something unrecognizable why would what’s on it be expected to stay perfect?

  • Ougie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    She would look way better without the tats. Even this shitty building would look better without this artless crap. And how is this a political take?

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because it’s essentially saying that her decision to get tattoos is the equivalent of her vandalizing her body. It’s a meme criticizing a woman for choosing what she wants to do with her body, which is just a tamer version of “your body my choice”.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Comparing women to objects tends to be more frowned upon by civilized people, which excludes the right.

      You’re welcome to find whatever you like attractive. She clearly doesn’t care about your opinion.

      • Ougie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sure my opinion is as worthless to her as hers is to me. And btw nobody is comparing the woman to the object, the point is that the aesthetic is similar. Applies to all sexes and objects. Imho the building tags are not art, or at least not good art. And her snakes, bugs and Japanese masks are so tired and trite, everyone does the same stuff. Yay.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Tired and trite? That sounds like most of mainstream movies, music, television… Yet people enjoy it. It is their choice to like what they like, and do what they do.

          Sure someone else may want the ceiling of the Sistine chapel tattood on them, but she chose this.

          • Ougie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            I’m happy for her, she can do whatever she wants. She’s still hot af. And people can watch whatever shit they want and they can have all the dumb opinions they want. That doesn’t change how I see it, and I like to think that my criticism is constructive.

  • Sheldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Both looks bad. It’s too many tattoos on one hand, and pretty scrambled a bad looking graffiti on the other hand.

  • redracc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m more curious as to how multiple different people tagged all like 8 floors of the building. Maybe it’s AI generated?

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I mean, it’s a fairly reasonable comparison aside from the fact the building is shitty. Is it political in any sense? I don’t think so.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I keep looking over the picture of the woman, trying to compare it to whatever the other image is of, and I’m not sure what they’re talking about. I’ve gone over every inch of her body and I don’t know what any of this is about. I’m sorry, what’s going on?

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        See how her boobs are round, but the bikini is flat on the front of them? Her bikini isn’t covering her sideboob. This top was designed for a girl with much smaller boobs, they’d be capable of actually bending around a smaller pair. These look like they’re stretched over the front, because they are. The bridge (part connecting the cups) also looks to not even be in contact with her chest, because her top can’t go all the way down around her boobs. She’s probably wearing a sister size with a bigger band and smaller cups, which means the part of the top designed for her underbust is stretching over her boobs.

        If she does very much physical activity, the edges of the cups will dig into her boobs, maybe painfully, and there’s a risk of slipping if she goes swimming or diving. Bras are designed so your boobs go in the cups, not entirely behind them. This picture doesn’t look comfy at all. She might be under the impression she’s a C or a D, when her actual cup size is much larger. This is what happens when our society pretends D is the biggest bust size. Thanks to decades of women being misinformed about their clothing, many people have been convinced that this appearance here is just what a big bust looks like in a bikini. So some people go for this look on purpose. That’s valid, but it isn’t comfortable.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Very well, valid points, but can we consider that was a conscious option? There are women that willingly buy smaller bikiny tops to create the illusion their breasts are bigger. Or that just prefer to show more skin.