• feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No worries, thanks for replying. When I say I don’t believe in them, I mean I don’t believe we (i.e. society) should create those systems. Unfortunately I absolutely believe we do create them, both deliberately and inadvertently.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s an interesting perspective.

      You think they’d form on their own? or we shouldn’t be getting to the point where they are needed or something else entirely ?

      • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think some degree of meritocracy (i.e. recognition of a skills hierarchy) is necessary for human advancement, but as it currently stands it’s impossible to separate that out from wealth privilege. If I had the answer, I’d make sure to tell everybody.

        There’s a million other processes by which wealth favours the accumulation of wealth, and it’s largely this “logic of capital” that results in the formation of class hierarchies and entrenched inequality/capital enclaves.

        That’s probably secondary to geography in the first instance, e.g. wealth in the form of agricultural surpluses and the use of grain as a fungible commodity and proto-currency.

        At this point a huge amount of wealth redistribution seems like a good start, and if it all flows back to the top, which I’d expect it to, then it’ll just need redistributing again.