• Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It doesn’t really matter that it’s still a long time away, once it arrives all previous messages could potentially be decrypted. Messages can be intercepted and stored, and I would bet a lot that an organization like the NSA does this. Feels to me like it’s more of a better be safe them sorry thing.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There are encyption methods in existence that are resistant to any likely implementation of quantum computing as it’s now understood. It may be that, in the future, quantum computing is developed to be better able to crack those ciphers, but it’s equally likely that other methods of encryption will be developed that are even more resistant to quantum cracking.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Again, what you’re not clocking here is that it will be a very, very long time before we have sufficient quantum compute time available to engage in large scale decryption. Even just getting to the point where they can decrypt all newly generated messages will be a long time. By that point you’d have decades of historical messages to did through.

      Barring some wild, out of nowhere leap forward in the feasibility, scalability and affordability of the tech, you’ll be dead by the time the NSA gets around to reading your old messages.

      • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        But they don’t have to dig trough all messages though. They can target specific people or organizations. And the fact that there is a possibility that this happens within the next 50 years, is a concern for spy agencies and other organizations with sensitive data.