A study that stoked enthusiasm for the now-disproven idea that a cheap malaria drug can treat COVID-19 has been retracted — more than four-and-a-half years after it was published.

… Its eventual withdrawal, on the grounds of concerns over ethical approval and doubts about the conduct of the research, marks the 28th retraction for co-author Didier Raoult, a French microbiologist, formerly at Marseille’s Hospital-University Institute Mediterranean Infection (IHU), who shot to global prominence in the pandemic. French investigations found that he and the IHU had violated ethics-approval protocols in numerous studies, and Raoult has now retired.

“Why it took more than four-and-a-half years after the study was initially published for the journal to come to this conclusion is not clear. It is also somewhat surprising that most of the paper’s authors still stand by study’s findings and conclusions despite its obvious inconsistencies, methodological flaws and potential ethical issues as outlined in the retraction note,” says Søgaard.

The paper (now marked as retracted): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The paper linking vaccines with autism was also retracted, and that didn’t stop them.

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    More proof that hydroxychloroquine is a miracle drug and the lizard people just don’t want us to know about it.

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Agree… So many people are so far gone from logic that anything and everything either proves them right or is a conspiracy. Guess free education is important in a society that wants to remain just this… A society of people living and functioning together. We are entering the “find out” phase

    • chuymatt@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I mean, it is an awesome drug! I use it a lot. Even in covid suffers - when COVID activates an autoimmune disease.

      Let’s do ivermectin next! I’ll go first: fantastic for endo and ectoparasites, and even a subset of folks with rosacea. Does jack all for Covid infections.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why is it that people sneer at non-medical doctors? Far more fraud is committed by the bois with stethoscopes around their shoulders. People be falling for that bedside rizz and getting played like a fiddle.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The damage is done. The conspiracy nuts will just believe that the all mysterious “they” are trying to hide research.

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I still don’t get why the higher ups pushed this and Ivermectin so hard. Like, they clearly aren’t anti big pharma, so it must be someone getting their beak wet. But who?

    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They wanted you to go back to work, not in X months if and when a vaccine was available, but tomorrow, taking some bullshit drug if you needed reassurance. While they were happy working from home, triple vaxxed and double masked.

      I don’t know what the intent was, only what it achieved. It is now political suicide to enforce public health mandates, so when the next pandemic hits, your boss will be able to force you to go to work in unsafe sanitary conditions and a lot of people will be cheering for it.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If you remember the time, Trump was pushing for any narrative that could let him say COVID wasn’t a big deal and would just disappear. He was looking for easy answers.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You want a conspiracy theory?

      It was designed to make any criticism of big pharma look crazy.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Which it also didn’t do. Nobody “trusts” “big Pharma”. They trust doctors, scientists, and the regulatory bodies that oversee them.

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It did what it needed to.

    Now that the damage is done, they can pretend to have integrity again to convince people to believe them when they publish the next “miracle study”.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    lol, all you can do is laugh. crying, yelling, pleading, recitation of observable fact, nothing will move the needle for the morons who think that any solution which assists both white people and brown people equally must be evil to be defeated

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      nothing will move the needle for the morons

      It’s quite easy to move their needle, just have trump tell them something and they’ll fight to the death to defend whatever dumb ass thing he told them.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Not really. Trump just adjusts his story when he notices it’s not well received. He even started to promote getting vaccinated to keep his base from dieing, noticed the pushback and changed his message to anti-vax again.

          • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s how he runs. It’s like those people “summoning spirits” doing a cold reading, but in a much larger scale.

            “I sense you are bothered by roads, airplanes, children, jobs”

            “Yes, jobs. How did you know?”

            “And it’s all the fault of trees, donkeys, cars, doctors, immigrants.”

            “I really hate immigrants.”

            “so we’ll build a bicycle, sidewalk, front door, barbed wire, a wall”

            “Oh yes, we need a wall to keep them out. This guy is really telling it like it is.”

            When asked later why he suggested a bicycle, this is vehemently denied even when recordings are shown.

    • Radin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      What are you even talking about? I can’t tell if you’re for or against the retraction of this obviously flawed study.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Pretty sure they are saying that vaccines are proven to help everyone, and that morons (RFK Jr, etc.) want to destroy them because vaccines helps black people.

        I hope that is what they are saying.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yes, the comment could use some light editing (and capitalization) but that’s correct.