Players must be assigned female at birth or have transitioned to female before going through male puberty to compete in LPGA tournaments or the eight USGA championships for females under new gender policies published Wednesday.
The policies, which begin in 2025, follow more than a year of study involving medicine, science, sport physiology and gender policy law.
The updated policies would rule out eligibility for Hailey Davidson, who missed qualifying for the U.S. Women’s Open this year by one shot and came up short in LPGA Q-school.
Davidson, who turned 32 on Tuesday, began hormone treatments when she was in her early 20s in 2015 and in 2021 underwent gender-affirming surgery, which was required under the LPGA’s previous gender policy. She had won this year on a Florida mini-tour called NXXT Golf until the circuit announced in March that players had to be assigned female at birth.
For golf though? I isn’t golf more about strategic use of speed, angle, and pitch? Where does gender have a place? Strength is not much of a factor which is why fat old people play it. If any sport should be gender neutral it would be golf.
Even NASCAR is gender neutral, and that needs strength for turning the wheel. According to a quick Google search:
Have you ever golfed?
There are literally mens tees and women’s tees (and usually kids tees, too)
Women’s tees are closer to the hole. (Kids are closest)
Yes, but this is the pro level so imbalances due to gender are not as pronounced.
At a pro level gender differences are the most pronounced. It’s below that where is mostly a wash.
The tees are closer. This isn’t a debate.
https://primeputters.com/does-lpga-play-from-ladies-tees/
The PGA averages 7,200 yards, so it’s still significantly shorter.
Red and white tees are made for more normal humans, which are both generally shorter.
Uh, no. This about professional golf. There aren’t “fat old people” playing on the pro tours. Strength is very much a factor. LPGA courses are shorter. Women’s average drive distance is about 45 yds shorter than the average for men.
You obviously don’t understand golf and made a lot of assumptions there. This a fairly reasonable rule. Probably unnecessary but better than an outright ban.
John Daly would disagree.
I would think so too, but looks like average golfing handicaps do still differ pretty dramatically between the genders. Golf is a very male dominated sport and I feel like that might be a major factor, but the numbers we’ve collected thus far do point to a difference. Not a big golfer, but the only thing I can think of is maybe driving hit range but, I wouldn’t think that could be responsible for the difference alone.
Some of it is down to biology (more strong muscle, me hit ball further) some to womens equipment being more of an afterthought, and a good deal down to the disparity in practice / coaching time. It’s not one single factor, but it is a big one that does impact how a.rpund is played. Not arguing the ethics of the above rule, I don’t think I have a particularly good solution, just these are the factors in the sport.
The PGA is open for men and women. The LPGA is only open for women. The fact that there are no women in the PGA is proof that golf is not gender neutral.