This article reads like outrage bait. It spends a lot of time tearing down the hyperbole of the piece it references without actually explaining much of anything as far as its rebuttal for going on several paragraphs. And the author appears to be enraged the whole time. While I agree that section 230 needs to be updated as the Internet changes and grows, I don’t know if this article is going to spur people to do it.
This article reads like outrage bait. It spends a lot of time tearing down the hyperbole of the piece it references without actually explaining much of anything as far as its rebuttal for going on several paragraphs. And the author appears to be enraged the whole time. While I agree that section 230 needs to be updated as the Internet changes and grows, I don’t know if this article is going to spur people to do it.