Summary

Journalists are increasingly abandoning X (formerly Twitter) for Bluesky, citing higher engagement and less toxicity. Since Elon Musk’s takeover of X, changes like deprioritizing external links and rising hate speech have alienated many, especially marginalized groups.

Bluesky, founded by Jack Dorsey, offers a more welcoming environment, especially for journalists and activists, with 20x the engagement in some cases.

Reporters note better traffic, reduced harassment, and a focus on diverse stories.

Organizations like The Guardian and fundraising groups also report greater success on Bluesky compared to X.

    • Fediverse Champion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      This is the most common reply to any mention of onboarding newcomers, but it’s not helpful. It’d be much more productive to hear specific criticisms so we can address them.

      • Is clicking the big “Join” (the default server) on joinmastodon.org really that big of a hurdle?
      • Is a firehouse home feed required to engage users from the start?
      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        There are other issues. Missing features (cited by people who bailed from Mastodon):

        1. a lack of “trending” list - that means journalists and other people who want to know what’s happening right now didn’t have a way to find events.

        2. no suggestions for follows. As a new user, how do people know what to follow?

        3. no suggested posts. Once I scroll through all the posts from the people I follow, the system doesn’t provide me with new posts.

        4. no quote tweets.

        It isn’t just that Mastodon has a weird onboarding experience, it’s that it doesn’t behave the way Twitter users have come to expect/need. I realize that is usually by design.

        Edit: added 4

    • That is a major issue the fediverse needs to fix.

      We need a single federated account that works across all platforms that iant tied to a single server even if said server goes down that preferably allows for your private key to be held by u. Ideally get this to work with the new passkey standard supported by google, apple, microsoft etc.

      Then. We need to make a website that is like 3 simple steps.

      Step 0: Option a) sign up with email Option b) sign up with username

      Step 1: Select or search for 3 categories ur interested in

      Step 2: Show me nsfw yes/no default no Show me extreme opinions yes/no default no (need to rework what word to use instead of “extreme”) Show me bot accounts yes/no default yes

      Step 2.5: automaticly send said user off to an instance that is the following:

      1. Respects their email/username sign up choice
      2. Related to their interests
      3. Respects their nsfw choice
      4. Is defederated from extreme instances for dont show me extreme opinions hexbear lemmy.ml etc 4.Respects the load any individual instance can handle that the instance admin can configure.

      Step 3: user signs up to the instance they have been directed to

      Step 4: reccommend people/communities etc fir them to follow/subscribe to. Reccommend blockliats for specific subjects, racist, tankie, asshole, nazi, etc.

      Done!

      Their already exists a standard for accounts just that its not yet been implemented into most services yet. Mastodon already has blocklists (although poorly managed and implemented). It wouldnt be too hard to make this website i could probably do it myself ngl.

      Should probably also drop this vid into the proccess somewhere as a quick explainer.

      • kobra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        It seems like Bluesky kind of did all of this with ATProto but they’re just met with constant criticisms

        It’s like everyone agrees mastodon isn’t the “right” special concoction but any attempt ever made to do something different or better and people shoot it down because it’s “not open like mastodon”

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Met with constant criticisms…here. Because people seem to care about feelings more than facts or results.

          • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            I think it comes down to people not liking that Bluesky is controlled by a board. But that’s what’s needed for mass adoption: a group of people to be accountable.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        That’s what bluesky’s DID based account identity does. Unless you make that key the sole authority (no key rotation, like nostr) then you need a registry as authority (like bluesky’s PLC registry)

        Bluesky specifically lets the account hosting server handle your auth, the directory points to where your account server is as in when you enter your handle, every 3rd party service and federated peer can do OAuth seamlessly to your account host. Then you can log into every compatible site with your handle, instead of having to get redirected “home” before you can interact. Your account server’s repository keeps records of all your posts and your social network, and you can even migrate seamlessly across hosts.