• AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          What the living fuck are you talking about ‘occupied China’

          that is the most brain broken anti-historic nonsense I’ve ever heard. The CPC is literally the result of decolonizing themselves. It was occupied until then. Not to be cliched but crack a fucking book holy shit

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I am aware of the terrorists sitting back while Real China 🇹🇼 tried protecting the people from the Japanese then not having the strength afterwards

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Chiang Kai-Shek was kidnapped by his own guards because he was too preoccupied on hunting down the communists to the ends of the earth to stop the Japanese from running rampant.

              I’d love to hear your explanation of how 8000 people hiding in one of the most remote regions of China came to win the civil war, if not through widespread popular support.

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              So you’re literally a genocidal fascist or too stupid to bother reading the history you’re claiming as the source of your righteousness.

              My money is you’re dumb af

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                Are you trying to deny that more Nationalist forces died during the 2nd Sino Japanese War than CCP forces and trying to call me dumb or are you just pro-Imperial Japan and trying to say they freed China?

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  As a matter of fact I will take this opportunity to call you dumb because your red herring of ‘who lost more troops against Japan’ has literally no bearing on any point of contention thus far raised.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Gets it in one.

      There’s a reason everyone is currently demonizing liberal ideology instead of standing up for the rights that the conservatives are working to strip away.

      • finderscult@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Liberal ideology is a regressive conservative ideology.

        It was progressive three centuries ago. It’s not anymore, it’s outlived it’s usefulness.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Unfortunately tankies throw out the good parts of liberalism along with the bad, and endorse throwing people in gaol for wrongthink.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Speaking of bad parts of liberalism: it’s wrong to throw Hitler into jail for spreading nazi thought

            Look at what your values actually are

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              Jesus fuck tankies are fucking morons. Do you actually think anybody buys your shitty argument?

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                If my argument is shitty, please engage with it instead of mugging for a crowd you assume is already on your side

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  No, I’m not going to spend effort engaging in good faith with an argument clearly made in bad faith.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It’s kinda unavoidable that if one major power loses influence, another will benefit from the vacuum. You can’t really oppose your own country’s imperialism without making the case that other countries taking advantage is an acceptable risk.

    This is more or less the story of WWI. With the increasing tensions and military buildup, socialists of countries across Europe formed the Second International and agreed in the Basel Declaration, which said that they would use the crisis to rise up simultaneously against every imperialist power and put an end to both the war and to capitalism:

    If a war threatens to break out, it is the duty of the working classes and their parliamentary representatives in the countries involved supported by the coordinating activity of the International Socialist Bureau to exert every effort in order to prevent the outbreak of war by the means they consider most effective, which naturally vary according to the sharpening of the class struggle and the sharpening of the general political situation.

    In case war should break out anyway it is their duty to intervene in favor of its speedy termination and with all their powers to utilize the economic and political crisis created by the war to arouse the people and thereby to hasten the downfall of capitalist class rule.

    But once the war actually broke out, most of them found reasons to rally around their country’s flag. German socialists pointed to the conditions of serfdom under the Tsar and pointed to the massive colonial empires of Britain and France, while British and French socialists argued that Germany undemocratic under the Kaiser and had more responsibility for starting the war. They mostly agreed that both sides were bad, but they said they were only fighting to safeguard their countries “against defeat” rather than for victory, but regardless, for all intents and purposes it was the same thing. Of course, in all of these countries, there was considerable political pressure and propaganda pushing them to fall in line and to regard the enemy as worse, and many people did what was personally advantageous regardless of what they had said previously.

    There was only one exception, where the socialists took advantage of the war to overthrow their government, without regard for the possibility that it could help the other side, and they did end up ceding a fair bit of land too, but they were able to put a stop that that theater of the meat grinder everyone was being fed into.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Listen, I’m as anti-imperialist as the next guy. But realistically if the core of capital that has nearly unopposed dominion over the entire world recedes, another entity that deserves the moniker of ‘empire’ completely equally will step in to fill the void! And if that’s the case, we should just support the most morally righteous empire. Ours >:-D

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      What’s that behind your back? Are you hiding a pile of severed children’s hands because they didn’t harvest rubber fast enough??

    • spacedout@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The vile Russian Empire, with its Romanov dynasty, super problematic. If Peter is so great, why does he look so wimpy compared to Joe Rogan? Hah, those stupid tankies don’t even realize the Chinese empire has been abolished for over 110 years!

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sorry for being snarky… Of course modern China is an empire. Just without overseas military bases. A soft empire, one might say.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            TF you mean ‘assimilated’

            If I lease you a part of my house (AT GUNPOINT NO LESS) for 10 years am I doing an imperial aggression when I move my stuff back in afterwards?

              • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I’m strongly of the belief, by reading them in the context provided, that you don’t know what any of those words mean

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Imperialism - building an empire by exerting control over foreign powers

                  de jure - by law

                  cassus belli - cause for war

                  So conquering other places is okay when the law says you have a good reason to send soldiers marching down their streets?