• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I just… I could never comprehend twitter (or Mastadon, or bluesky for that matter).

    The whole structure of the conversation feel like people shouting into an open auditorium. And everyone is shouting at once.

    I just do not see the appeal.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I thought it was a great idea for official statements. Kind of like a new type of RSS feed.

      Local transport companies can advertise delays, meteorology organisations can advertise natural disasters, police can post active missing person alerts, etc.

      But it seems like it is just vapid narcissists thinking other people give a shit about their random thoughts.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why does an RSS feed need a “new type” tho? Normal RSS can be hosted by anyone and can be read on so many different readers…

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      About 15 years ago, I moved to a city where I didn’t know anyone. I joined Twitter because I like to try new apps as early as possible. It turned out to be a great place to talk about live music in my city, amongst other things. I met all my friends on Twitter.

      At that time in my city, it was very much the town square that Elon wants it to be now. It was a place to discuss events in realtime; especially sporting events.

      I suspect the advantage for Twitter was that you could communicate with people you didn’t know directly like celebrities, authors, politicians, etc. Not just write to them, but they write back because sending off a short message is much easier than making a call or writing a letter. Sometimes that is an unhealthy parasocial relationship but, it doesn’t have to be.

      Kevin Smith basically started writing the movie Tusk in a collaborative way with Twitter.

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Me too but here’s one useful function:

      Perhaps you are aware there is an ongoing event, say for example a football game, or an election, or an outage of your email service provider. You go to one of these “scream into the void” social sites, search on the topic, and learn what people are saying about it. Maybe someone knows what’s really going on, maybe some of those people have some interesting insights and you engage with them, not unlike you and I are engaging right now. Others can observe, perhaps contribute, and after the event has concluded, everyone goes their own way. Hopefully in the end the interactions are beneficial for all.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Me too. Tried twitter way back in the early days of it. Never found it useful. Others did though obviously, which I don’t understand, but they did. What I find interesting is the seeming need to replace it with something similar. Why? Is it like gradually kicking an addiction by switching to something slightly less bad, but not going full cold turkey?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        What I find interesting is the seeming need to replace it with something similar. Why?

        Oh yeah. Why? Yeah… yeah I could never imagine leaving one toxic social media and then trying to find a similar replacement…