• Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Why do these privileged kids go to the deadliest places on earth just for adventure? It’s kind of offensive tbh

    Edit:

    Laos is a source, and to a lesser extent, a transit and destination country for human trafficking. As a criminal activity, trafficking in person is difficult to evaluate and statistics documenting the scale of this subject in Laos are poor. International surveys estimate that between 200,000 and 450,000 people are trafficked annually within the Greater Mekong Subregion.

    McKenzie let’s go on an adventure in one of the most dangerous places on earth! People are dying of poverty but just step over them and see how pretty that sunset.

    I know you Lemmy kids don’t like to hear it, but us people raised in the third world think you’re idiots running around backpacking through dangerous places with Dad’s money

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Both of you are scared of any traveling that isn’t a resort lol

        Pure pussy behavior

        • Steak@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Wtf I never said I was afraid lol. But when you go to a third world country and the third world gets ya. Don’t be fuckin surprised.

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Wtf I never said I was afraid lol

            Your life is a constant struggle, isn’t it

              • kandoh@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Talking to right-wing people like yourself is always a useful reminder that it’s not that we have a difference of opinions, but rather that you are all so fucking stupid, too stupid to even have a conversation with.

                • Steak@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Never mind I just looked at you comment history. Everything is political to you. All you do is argue about politics all day. You are sick. Everything is a war to you online and it’s all political. You probably forgot who you were even talking to and what about when you started arguing with me. You just reverted back to the only thing you know how to do.

                • Steak@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Seriously at what point during this did you decide that it’s political and that I’m right wing? I really need to know lmfao.

                • Steak@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Dude I’m not even right wing holy shit lmfao you don’t even know how to have a conversation. I’m asking you questions and all you can do is insult me and then for some reason decide I’m a right wing person. Like wtf did I even do lmao?? And when the Fuck did you decide this is political. And why do you feel so threatened hahahaha

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Carrots have been recalled in the US because they killed a guy, that’s on top of gun shot being the #1 cause of death for American children. I think Laos is pretty safe by comparison.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Laos is a source, and to a lesser extent, a transit and destination country for human trafficking. As a criminal activity, trafficking in person is difficult to evaluate and statistics documenting the scale of this subject in Laos are poor. International surveys estimate that between 200,000 and 450,000 people are trafficked annually within the Greater Mekong Subregion.

        Sounds like a very safe place for two pretty white teens traveling alone. /S

        • Steak@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dude you’ll never get anywhere in here with logic and reason sorry.

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            When people are arguing with you about unsafe alcohol, and you randomly bring up human trafficking because that’s where your mind cooked by rural fear porn immediately goes — that’s not making a good argument, sorry

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Offensive because you are too poor and it makes you feel bad by comparison?

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I can sense your seething hate for poor people through your comment. Keep your bigotry to yourself. My comment referred to them backpacking through one of the deadliest places on earth and calling it an “adventure”. I wonder how fun the adventure is for the people in Laos who deal with human trafficking daily

        Laos is a source, and to a lesser extent, a transit and destination country for human trafficking. As a criminal activity, trafficking in person is difficult to evaluate and statistics documenting the scale of this subject in Laos are poor. International surveys estimate that between 200,000 and 450,000 people are trafficked annually within the Greater Mekong Subregion.

        You rich kids go to bad places, step over poor and dying people and ignore the suffering while you go “wow what an adventure!”

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Your claim it is one of the most dangerous parts of the world simply doesn’t hold up. Laos doesn’t contain any of the top 100 most dangerous cities.

          Laos is mostly considered to have a normal level of danger, except areas bordering Myanmar due to civil war, and Xaisomboun province due to civil unrest, as advised by multiple countries:

          https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/destinations/asia/laos

          https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/laos-travel-advisory.html

          https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/laos

          Secondly I don’t hate poor people, I was pointing out your hate of people with the means to enjoy their lives.

          Young people travelling and experiencing new cultures is a good thing. What else would a person call that but an adventure?

          Also it wasn’t the victims that used that word it was the media. You decided you hated the victims before you knew anything about them.

          step over poor and dying people and ignore the suffering while you go “wow what an adventure!”

          Yea the poor would really appreciate if you kept your income and wealth entirely in your own nation thanks. Tourism has never been important to an economy.

          You are a short sighted and angry fool. Too focused on your own situation to view the world through any other lense.

        • foofy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Didn’t you literally say you were offended by some people you don’t know choosing to go to Laos…?

          • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ah, I see the issue. You can’t read. I said it’s kinda offensive when people go to poor places and call it an adventure.

            You should try Kumon

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I want everyone to understand that you can not have methanol type poisoning from the regular beer brewing process. Too many people think home brewing is harder or can lead to poisoning… it just doesn’t happen.

      This is only possible in commercial brewing where the tanks have temperature jackets.

      And even in commercial brewing you’re required to use safe substances in the jackets, in case there is some type of hole. In the US I think the only thing approved is propylene glycol which is non-toxic (but expensive in large quantities).

      How this even happened is beyond me… but that’s why they require food safe, just in case.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You can’t get methanol poisoning from normal beer brewing process but you could from someone spiking their beer to up the abv, though that still seems unlikely.

        Also when distilling it is more a matter of scale. Heads have a high level of methanol so if your batch is big enough and you don’t discard the heads then you can get a whole bottle or more of methanol which is more than enough to make you sick. Probably not going to happen with a 5 or 10 gallon mash but some moonshiners do large enough batches where it is technically possible, through massive incompetence, to poison people.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Another fun fact you reminded me of when talking about getting something up the their ABV is that in the US you’re allowed a very significant margin of error, basically 0.3%. This is because it can be hard to control fermentation temperature and batches can vary… But that’s not the case for the big brewers, they can afford tanks with precision that would have been thought impossible before. So basically any light beer you see, you can shave like 0.3% off that. If it says 4.5, it’s likely 4.2, bud heavy is probably more like 4.7 now.