🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agoAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1500arrow-down151
arrow-up1449arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tindersh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 days agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-squareSaledovil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down2·7 days ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up33·7 days agoI stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
minus-squareclickyello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·7 days agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.