ElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 days agoAsking the real questionsjlai.luimagemessage-square220fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down111
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageAsking the real questionsjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 8 days agomessage-square220fedilink
minus-squareBatmanAoD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·8 days agoBut differently spelled names are legally distinct.
minus-squarelseif@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 days agoi think they mean that pronounciation matters for determing validity, not for the actual record or distinguishing between names
minus-squareBatmanAoD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 days agoBut that doesn’t really address the original question, does it? You don’t have to pronounce all the letters in a name, so the fact that you can’t pronounce a newline isn’t sufficient to demonstrate that it can’t be part of a name.
But differently spelled names are legally distinct.
i think they mean that pronounciation matters for determing validity, not for the actual record or distinguishing between names
But that doesn’t really address the original question, does it? You don’t have to pronounce all the letters in a name, so the fact that you can’t pronounce a newline isn’t sufficient to demonstrate that it can’t be part of a name.