• psivchaz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    I was in a position like this once. The first two or three months were great. TBH, I mostly played video games and cleaned the house. It felt like free money. By the six month mark, I quit to go to something else. It’s surprising how mentally draining it is to just do nothing.

    I think I took two things away from that experience: One, I think people generally have an innate need to produce something. We don’t want to just sit around and entertain ourselves, we want to contribute. Two, I think the 40 hour work week isn’t quite the right balance. Maybe 30 would be better.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Eh, I have kids, so I already have enough mental drain w/o my full-time job, so I think I’d end up catching up on things I’ve been putting off, like exercise, repairs around the house, etc.

      In fact, I lost my job at the start of COVID and didn’t start looking for a few months because nobody was hiring. I got so much stuff done around the house, and I was able to essentially home-school my kids at the end of one school year and the beginning of the next. I really enjoyed that, and I would totally homeschool my kids if I didn’t need to work every day to pay the bills.

      So yeah, I’d absolutely appreciate a 30-ish hour work week, especially if I got one whole day off instead of it being spread across 5-days.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        In your case your productivity is spend around your house and kids and not on jobs, in OOP’s case they spend their time consume. I know i can take the latter but only for a day or two, but i’ll definitely shift to the former soon after.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Even if I didn’t have kids, I’d have plenty of things to do with my SO: hiking, traveling, cooking, etc. “Productivity” has a lot of forms, and many of them aren’t marketable at all, so I really don’t think I’d need to look for a job if I didn’t need the pay.

          If you’re single and/or your friends/SO all still work, then yeah, I imagine you’d get pretty bored after a month or so. But if you already have a lot of fulfilling things you’d like to do but don’t have time for, I think not working could work out pretty well.

          My brother didn’t get married until about 40yo and had a fantastic job (made it to VP level as an actuary), so he made way more than he could spend. He ended up being able to retire around the time he got married, and he inherited 3 kids (she’s a widow). He’s been retired for several years now and still finds plenty of things to keep himself occupied. He could totally work if he wanted, there’s just other things taking his time.

          Everyone is different. For some people, work is the most fulfilling thing, which is why we’ll see many very wealthy people working into their 70s (or 90s for Warren Buffett). For others, relationships are more important, so they quit as soon as they have enough. And for others, various hobbies fill that spot. So it really depends on what gives your life meaning.

          For me, it’s my SO and kids, followed by FOSS. So if I didn’t have to work, I’d spend more time on those, not look for another job.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      One, I think people generally I have an innate need to produce something. We I don’t want to just sit around and entertain ourselves myself, we I want to contribute. Two, I think the 40 hour work week isn’t quite the right balance for me. Maybe 30 would be better for me.

      It’s good to learn from experiences, but it’s not good to assume that your experience is everyone’s experience.