• Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      No it isn’t when there’s probable cause. And “dude started running after me” is enough for self defense to kick in. Actually it is probably enough to charge the dude.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      12 days ago

      Intentionally causing a person to fear harm is assault. Greentext is committing assault. It might not be possible to convict for it, but it’s still assault.

    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They had legitimate reason to believe they were in danger. Not assault at all. Unlikely to be assault.

      Edit: Guess I shouldn’t say “definitely not assault”. Don’t have all the information here, so can’t come to any definitive conclusions.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          A man, in a hoodie, that speeds up his step when they try to walk away from him faster, at 2am. Context matters a lot here.

        • underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          It’s more than just “a man within range of vision”. Obviously we don’t have the full story here, but even in the text, there are specific behaviors that would, arguably, make a reasonable person suspect they were in imminent danger. Depending on the state, that is enough to trigger self-defense definition.

        • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          The entire greentext is about OP going out of their way to look as threatening as possible while still having plausible deniability. Like… Your position goes against the OPs intent.