• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    You missed the big one, which they empasise themselves: plants are really power-inefficient. They’ve already quadrupled it with their acetate-producing reaction from 1% to 4%. Meanwhile, solar cells can be 30-40% efficient. That means you can feed a lot more people with a lot less resources.

    In a way, it’s like the agricultural revolution happening all over again - we go down another trophic level, and now humans are the autotrophs. Apparently they’ve already gotten this method to work with mushrooms.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Yes, I also forgot to mention this tech is a safeguard against supply-side shocks. like with wheat after Russia attacked Ukraine.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        Perhaps it can be scaled down easily to something that fits in a home. It could be a fridge sized machine that’s hooked up to power and water and keeps producing fresh food. That’ll cut out the middlemen.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          That would be dope, especially in places like where I live that are difficult to supply fresh produce to. Right now I just have to settle for a basement greenhouse.

          I feel the need to point out this is way more expensive upfront than a patch of dirt, though, so we’re not going to make the switch overnight even if it’s earns itself back easily in the long run.