Lemmy.world is very popular, and one of the largest instances. They do a great job with moderation. There’s a lot of positives with lemmy.world

Recently, over the last month, federation issues have become more and more drastic. Some comments from lemmy.world take days, or never, synchronize with other instances.

The current incarnation of activity pub as implemented in Lemmy has rate issues with a very popular instance. So now lemmy.world is becoming a island. This is bad because it fractures the discussion, and encourages more centralization on Lemmy.world which actually weakens the ability of the federated universe to survive a single instance failing or just turning off.

For the time being, I encourage everyone to post to communities hosted on other instances so that the conversation can be consistently access by people across the entire Fediverse. I don’t think it’s necessary to move your user account, because your client will post to the host instance of a community when you make a comment in that community I believe.

Update: other threads about the delays Great writeup https://lemmy.world/post/13967373

Other people having the same issue: https://lemmy.world/post/15668306 https://aussie.zone/comment/9155614 https://lemmy.world/post/15654553 https://lemmy.world/post/15634599 https://aussie.zone/comment/9103641

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not really if in the background everything is divided over a bunch of servers and backed up by other servers

    It’s the only way to solve the centralization of users, take the option away from them and handle it in the background.

    • jet@hackertalks.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Let’s say whoever is running the front end doesn’t like a community and blocks it… How do we prevent that?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You don’t have “somebody running the front end” though, it’s all done by the people providing hosting services.

        Think “crypto philosophy as a message board” but instead of having everyone sync the whole history you split all data randomly in a way that guarantees it is stored on three servers at all time.

        Heck, you could also have multiple front ends if you wanted, all pulling and pushing data to the same servers and this way you could log in from any of them, the front end would only have an influence on UI/UX, in the background the data would always come from the same places and for this reason the front end dev wouldn’t have the power to block communities.

        • jet@hackertalks.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ok. So just like Lemmy but communities are spread using some hash table over multiple existing nodes?

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yep, divide everything so no one has real power and it’s the users that decide what they want and don’t want on their feed, allow the hosts to decide if they want to host NSFW content or not (and the users can make the same choice), make it so the users don’t have to decide what instance they register with, their credentials are just stored in the database.

            For the front end you then have two ways to deal with it, a single one and the hosts “vote” on how to deal with it (crypto style) or the hosts are the database that anyone can access and it allows anyone to create a front end…