• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    There’s also the Great Circle flight paths. Essentially, because the earth is round, it’s actually a shorter distance to fly in an “arc” (when looking at a flat map). In the below picture, the upper curved line is actually shorter than the lower straight line:

    Here’s another image which demonstrates why the curved line looks longer on a flat map:

    And because of how map projections work, this applies to virtually any flight path that isn’t directly north/south… Just like the one in OP’s photo.

    • merdaverse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The path in the post has nothing to do with the great circle. The shortest path is very similar to how it appears on the Mercator projection (actually slightly bent in the other direction) because SF and Houston are fairly close and in a position where Mercator distortions are less pronounced.

      Also, a line is the shortest path when the 2 points are both on the Equator (where the projection distortion is zero)

      • maxdejesus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s also good to mention that the projection shown in the tweet wasn’t Mercator either, it was a globe rendered via Apple Maps.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Worth pointing out too, that the air isn’t “flat” either, you can have headwinds, tailwinds, and turbulence that will affect the shortest and most economical path.