• xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is hard to do well which is why I worry. Google probably has the best overall account security, you could fo worse than modeling after them.

    The short answer to your question is Passkeys. But you need a whole system of account recovery around them.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh, you can easily bypass passkeys with automation. Don’t even need an image recognition model, just a QR-code scanner like zbarimg.

      But i never tried googles passkey feature since it never seemed as secure as a 48 char computer generated password. So I’m not sure exactly how it works.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a pretty wild claim. It almost sounds like you don’t know what a passkey is. Explain.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Oh I don’t know what it is, sorry I thought I made that clear. But a quick search on the internet said it was basically 2fa with a qr code and since the issue was how it would protect Lemmy from bots I just thought it wouldn’t be hard for a bot to read a qr code.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Bruh that’s gotta be one of the worst trains of thought I’ve seen recently ngl. I don’t even know how passkeys work and I know that. Based on your understanding, you could log into someone’s account just by reading a QR code. Which of these is more likely:

            • The entire cybersecurity community mysteriously and completely forgot that machines can read QR codes (which is, by the way, literally the entire purpose of a QR code)

            • You don’t understand how passkeys work

            How arrogant do you have to be?

            • CubitOom@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Well again, the claim was that somehow passkeys would stop Lemmy from being flooded by bots.

              So in that situation, we aren’t talking about hacking. We are simply talking about if a login could be triggered programmatically. So if Lemmy required passkeys to be used instead of passwords. And if the passkeys required scanning a QR code to sign in. I imagine It would provide minimal disruption to an automated login.

              Now if the passkeys somehow enforced a real human to do something that only a human could do, then yes it would stop an automated registration/login. However if it’s possible to automate then it wouldn’t stop bots.