President Joe Biden warned Monday that a Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity from prosecutionwould make an unchecked Republican Donald Trump “more emboldened to do whatever he wants” if he regains the White House in November’s election.

Biden, under intense pressure after his disastrous debate performance against Trump last week, urged Americans to think carefully about their election decision and signaled he had no intention of dropping out of the race.

Criticizing the decision by the court’s conservative majority — which all but guarantees Trump will not face trial in Washington ahead of the November election over his actions during the violent riot on Jan. 6, 2021 — Biden said it now fell to the American people “to do what the courts should have been willing to do but will not.

“The American people have to render judgment about Donald Trump’s behavior.”

  • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    It looks like nobody involved in this story understands the concept of consequences. Trump can be now disappeared without repercussions. The judges that voted this could be arrested with their families and everybody they know. And Biden may be facing the same situation in a few months if he doesn’t do something drastic immediately. Is somebody putting LSD in the water supplies? I don’t understand how anybody on either side can think this is a good idea.

  • halferect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Hey biden you are the fucking president right now why don’t you use your new freedom to do something

  • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Every move like this gets them closer and closer to full on fascism, and gives them more and more power to destroy us and all we can do is hope the idiot democrats put a stop to it, even though all they’re doing is sTrOnGlY cOnDeMnInG their actions…

  • AshMan85@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He needs to take the gloves off. The traitors are literally acting out their plan for a civil war and democrats are waiting there bent over to take it.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      “We keep letting other people make the world worse, and no one seems to love us for it. What gives?”

      • ExperiencedWinter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        In what way is this like what happened with the civil war? States started leaving the union before Lincoln was even in office, not 3 years into his term

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          IIRC, the secessions were preceeded by a period where it was sort of an open secret of what’s gonna happen, with stuff like future confederate generals transferring cannon stock to southern bases, and moving themselves and their families south, and the North by and large stood by and let it happen under the rationale that “we shouldn’t anger them, they may still come around”. To the point that, again, IIRC, the commander of Fort Sumter saw trouble brewing across the river and requested reinforcements just before the war, and was turned down.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            Then after the Civil War, we treated the treasonous States with kid gloves and allowed them to openly idolize their traitorous leaders, leading to where we are now.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    A gesture that has no meaning and even less significance

    “To the violent, non-violence means nothing”

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Damn it, democrats. Quit being little bitches. For 30 years ive watched you roll over or play nice and its gotten us screwed over. Have the 5 or 6 Supreme Court justices who decided this hung for treason. Show a country that’s sick of corruption. Politicians used to be afraid of the stick. America quit carrying one decades ago.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      He doesn’t even need to do it for real, if he just announced that he’s going to hang them they woild backpedal immediately

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You don’t want the immunity to stick? Then show SCOTUS why it’s a bad idea. Arrest their families. Use eminent domain to take their property. Abuse your power as president to show them how fucking stupid they are being.

  • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    270
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fuck that. Biden should make them regret this decision. If his candidacy is as DOA as everyone is pretending it is, then there’s no incentive to play by the rules. Move fast and break stuff and get some shit done for a change.

    Also,

    Biden, under intense pressure after his disastrous debate performance against Trump last week

    They just had to get it in there. Not a mention of Trump making shit up the whole time, or the raving lunatic shit he’s saying on the campaign trail. 90 minutes of Biden being low energy and it’s all over. “The other guy is too old, maybe we can do a little fascism. That will be OK, right?”

    • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Insane that I have yet to see an article about trump lies during the debate. All I saw was Biben be replace bs articles.

      • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Because Trump lies. It’s old news. There was no way that debate was going to play well for Biden. He had nothing to gain. People voting for Trump are voting for Trump, people not voting for Trump are either Voting for Biden or staying home. Biden has to convince people not to stay home, not convince people not to vote for Trump.

        The people that vote for Trump are people so sick of the current state of politics they want to burn it all down. Very few actually think he’s a great president. He’s a troll vote. Biden’s performance made more people want to watch the world burn.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, not insane. 100% expected. This is the danger of electing an obligate serial liar. We have all been accustomed to his bullshitting. About the size of crowds, about how much money he has, about how fucking oppressed he is, about stolen this and unfair that, etc. No one has the energy to give a fuck anymore. It’s all old news.

        I fear the only way out of this is violence.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        Almost every article I saw posted following the debate touched on Trump’s falsehoods.

        But also, Trump lying is not news. He lied all the way to his 2016 win, and lied decades before that, and still lies now. Absolutely no one new is going to be convinced that he’s bad because he lies. If absolutely anyone is thinking of voting of Trump at this point, him lying is not going to be the deciding factor.

        • Audacious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think it should be hammered to death because a person in power should not ever be allowed to get away with lying. I know morality isn’t in law, but it should be, IMO. The world is so fucked up in so many ways because no one puts morals in law.

      • numbermess@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s crazy that this is the kind of shit we’re counting on now. It used to be the Guardrails and then it was the Wheels of Justice grinding exceedingly fine and now it’s Maybe Something Good Will Happen at the Last Minute

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          At this point, I’m hoping for an Iranian-style helicopter crash for Trump, Bannon and a few others, Harlan and Thomas get killed in a hurricane wile vacationing abroad, and the other conservative supreme court justices all get get incapacitated by some disease or something.

          If the entirety of the heritage foundation could get hit by a fridge-sized meteorite, that would be great.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m just saying with this ruling Biden could do something really weird in the transitional period and it probably would take the rest of his life to go to court for it.

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every time Biden had that “confused” look on his face during the debate, he was reacting to some absolute bullshit tRump had just said and the media turned it into “Biden confused”. Biden WAS low energy, what was trump on? It is also easier to spew bullshit, when there is ABSOLUTELY NO PUSH BACK, then it is to remember ACTUAL facts. Watching the follow up I felt like I was being gaslit on what I actually watched

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry, are you suggesting that the media is against Biden? Cause they’ve been for him for months. Any apprehension about his future prospects have nothing to do with Trump being a lying sack of shit. I won’t apologize for Biden sucking. I do like the idea of him turning the scotus ruling on them.

      • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        What media have you been looking at? The only thing I’ve seen about Biden for months has been about how he’s too old. And occasionally a bit about him supporting Israel, whether that’s presented in a positive or negative light.

  • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Biden literally has the power to do something now, but is instead using this to campaign? Infuriating, we got you in office already, to protect against this exact thing from happening. Stop sitting on your ass and do something if you want the American public to forget the debate.

      • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The supreme court has basically given Biden the power to act as a King now, then take advantage and…

        1. Dismantle the supreme court, and start the process of HIM choosing who will be the new supreme court.
        2. Imprison all who seek out to destroy our democracy for financial gain.
        3. Forgive all student loans
        4. Change the constitution to codify roe vs wade
        5. Give all homeless a home by taking away property for rent that’s been on the market for more than 6 months.
        6. Dismantle or block the entirety of Project 2025.
        7. Make law that no entity can legally own more than 5 or 10 properties.
        8. Make law that no one that has been recently convicted of a crime in the last year can run for any office (much less the president).
        9. Force term limits on congress and the house.
        10. Force term limits on the supreme court.
        11. Stop treating coorporations as people.
        12. Codify the chrevron ruling that got overturned.
        13. Forgive all medical debts and make Medicaid for all to all americans.
        14. Delist any news organization that either overly exaggerates or lies to the public (ie. Fox, Newsmax, CNN).
        15. Let NOAA make their weather app they wanted.
        16. Implement the green new deal properly now.

        Use the weapons of your enemy against them.

        There probably more this to add, hut that’s just on the top of my mind.

        • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The court didn’t grant him more powers to do things like this list, it only grants him immunity from committing crimes.

          • 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Ok, then he can abuse his power and do these things anyway.

            I mean, this is literally what Trump will do (the abuse of power and illegal shit), and we should not take the high road because WE WILL loose to them.

      • eran_morad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Get Justice to arrest and imprison Thomas and Alito. Nominate 2 liberals to the Court and get Justice to arrest and imprison McConnell et al when they pull their bullshit. Continue until 2 liberals are seated.

        I fear that if we don’t start playing by their rules, we will have no more stake in the country.

        • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          All you idiots keep preaching two wrongs making a right. Biden doing this shit would just empower the next republican to do the same. Sliding into tyranny is not ok just cause your side is doing it against the side you don’t like.

          • eran_morad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Are you fucking dense? We’re already past the point of no return. We’re already being victimized by them, and you’re fucking rolling over. Fuck off.

            • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              What has this ruling done to victimize any of us so far? How is trying to overturn an election an “official” act of the president? I’m not rolling over. I’m pointing out your solution is fucking stupid and not a solution.

              • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Are you a bot or are you just blind? Wait for trump to go to office with this power and let’s see how nobody gets victimized.

                • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Are you blind? The person said we are currently being victimized. I point out that’s not true and your response is just wait and see??

              • eran_morad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Christ on a shitstick - the Supreme Cunts have decreed that one man stands above justice, and you’re out here asking dumbass questions like “HuR hOw DoEs DiS vIcTiMiZe??”

                Fuck off already.

                • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Official acts as president. Not unofficial. Official could be seen as airstriking another country. Unofficial can easily be interpreted as trying to steal the election. Yet most of you are out here advocating for biden to set precedent of assassinating an opponent… really makes you wonder what narrative some people are trying to push. Surely seems like destabilizing the remaining bit of a country we have.

          • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            He’s been granted tyrannical power without asking. He should definitely use it to get rid of those trying to destroy democracy, and then also destroy the rules that gave him that power in the first place. Doing absolutely nothing at all and expecting things to get fixed is so beyond stupid, there isn’t even a word for it.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s pretty simple, he could walk outside the White House, declare to the public “I’m on a fuckin’ smoke break bitches” and immediately punch a child in the face. This would be an Unofficial act of the President and a violent crime.

          • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Incorrect, because statements the president makes to the public cannot be used as evidence of his acts being unofficial.

            (This was part of the ruling too)

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Anything, because the SCOTUS decides what is and isn’t “official.” Democrat does it = unofficial. Republican does it = official.

      • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Jail the conservative justices, expand the court, have Trump shot in the fucking face, and barr any felons from serving or running for President.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          ? jail them for what? exactly? what law did they break? the courts would release them over night.

          • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            He cannot jail them, but he can disappear them a la Harry Potter and the Consequences of Unchecked Power

          • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            The notion is to commit a criminal act of false imprisonment, since he is immune from prosecution now. He is allowed to commit crimes, so he should use that power for good instead of just sitting there on his ass waiting for conservatives to show us how it’s done.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        First off, he’s the one in office, not me. He’s the one we voted to in to fix this and he hasn’t done that. He already campaigned on the fact that we had to prevent a dictatorship in the last election. He’s had four years to figure out what to do. That’s the issue at hand here.

        Secondly, he can now legally do anything. So use your creative juices, it’s pretty obvious that he can do something, especially now. Not only was Trump given keys to a dictatorship, Biden was given those same exact keys. It’s time to play hardball.

      • Sabata@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seal Team 6 the supreme court, then have the new justices remove the powers from him. If he is the new dictator then he needs to play the part before Trump dose. Were fucked no matter what.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The seal team would call that an illegal order under the ucmj. Hidden couldn’t be prosecuted for giving the order, but the seal team would say no.

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Has the ruling not fully sunk in for you yet? He could legally find a way to do anything now. He could make it legal and override the ucmj. The hired guns (SEALs or mercs), in this hypothetical, would not say no. Especially not from the commander in chief with new dictator-level powers.

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              He can’t be imprisoned for it. That doesn’t mean what he does is just allowed today any more than it was last week.

              • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Wtf are you on? It DOES mean exactly that. If laws now have no consequences, there are de facto no laws. How can anybody not see this?

              • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                So, what happens when he officially declares mar-a-lago a threat to national security and takes it out? Because before this ruling, he could’ve been imprisoned at the very least. But somehow it’s still the same now, even after this ruling? If that’s the case, then why did the Supreme Court even rule?

      • TreeGhost@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m no legal expert, but could he possibly form a judicial ethics committee to investigate supreme court justices. On any evidence of violating ethics, he could sign an arrest warrent to remove them from the court.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          The supreme court are the only ones responsible for their own ethics. We just recently tried to force this.

          We’re literally a fucking joke of a country. Supreme court “justices” don’t even need any experience whatsoever. You or I could be a justice.

          • TreeGhost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            So they say, but they also just said the president had immunity for official acts. If Biden did this while at the same time urging Congress to pass judicial ethics laws, who could stop him? Hell, expand it to the federal court system and tell the committee to move fast and prioritize the most unethical judges in key positions and either the Republicans have to play ball with Democrats on passing judicial reform through law or the remaining sane judges reverse a few key decisions to unfuck our current judicial quandary.

            • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I agree on this one. The Supreme Court is clearly compromised and needs to be thoroughly investigated for corruption and have their recent, self interest driven rulings revoked.
              It’d be a super presidential act that’d definitely benefit all of us. Guess they can’t charge him for breaking the rules to fix this cluster fuck.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          ban them sounds good on it’s face. but it’s a state issue of who is on the ballet.

          but here is another problem : while biden couldn’t be prosecuted for issuing the order, would the order hold up in court? you know the thing would go before the supreme court. would it hold up there?

          i do like the idea though.

      • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Send out a hit squad on 45 with his new presidential immunity

        Or impeach/remove the corrupt justices and pack the court

  • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I know I will respect the limits of presidential power as I have for the three-and-a-half years, but any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law,”

    “Yes we may be in a steel cage wrestling match. But I’m still going to follow gentlemens rules. Those tables, chairs and ladders are off-limits to me; My moral superiority will win the day.”

    Tom Howard voiceover: “It didn’t”

  • Hello_there@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This speech was a capitulation by Biden. He basically said ‘no, executive isn’t going to check the judiciary.’ His response is 'people need to vote’s? What? Where’s the vision or game plan to overturning this?
    It’s so fucking simple to grasp the shortfalls here.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m hoping he’s just giving us a chance to correct this. That will do good in the long run if we manage it. Should we fail it is also my hope that he uses his remaining time in the chair to abuse those executive powers to all hell.

      In reality, yes, he could do more right now.

  • retrospectology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    President Joe Biden warned Monday that a Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity from prosecutionwould make an unchecked Republican Donald Trump “more emboldened to do whatever he wants” if he regains the White House in November’s election.

    And the justices kind of looked around quizzically and said “Yeah…no shit, that’s the whole idea. Did you just get that?”

    • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s spelling it out for voters to get them off their asses. People said “yeah right” in 2016 when the ones who were paying attention said that the scotus was on the ballot, and it turns out we were right. It’s probably good to hear the calm warnings straight from him rather than just from “alarmist” friends, relatives, and coworkers this time.

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        It makes him look even more out of touch with the moment though and incompetent.

        If he’s still unwilling to back a campaign to court pack and still unwilling to remove the biggest obstacle to a possible Democratic win in November (himself), his words mean very little. It’s just more too little too late by Biden.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Could this response be any more weak and flaccid?

    Wake the fuck up! It’s not someone else’s problem to solve. It’s yours.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not our job to solve it, he’s the one that was voted in to figure it out. He’s had four years, now has legal power to do just about anything, and came out with this response?

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yet here you are saying to do something and yet you can’t come up with one specific thing

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Why should I? I’m not the President of the United States who was just granted dictator-level powers.

            Name one thing he couldn’t do.

            Personally (and since you’re persistent), I think he should declare Mar-a-lago and Trump a threat to national security. Then, he should personally use marine one to liberate the residence.

            Is that specific enough for you?

          • treefrog@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            He’s the only person in the country who can pull out a 9mm and shoot Trump in broad daylight without it being a crime. As well as every SCJ that voted for this immunity. He can then replace every SCJ he executed with his own appointments. If Congress won’t approve his appointments, he can keep killing them until the vote passes.

            This ruling is a free pass for dictators. All Biden has to do is act like one. I doubt he would, but he legally could.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think there’s more than enough examples in these comments to satisfy the curiosity.

        Whatever should a recently unmoored, democratically elected leader do in the face of a blatantly undemocratic, unamerican ruling? He’s only just short of all powerful.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        He could drone strike all his enemies and their families to the third generation. He can do anything in an official capacity and there’s literally nothing stopping him.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          So your answer of how can Biden solve the problem of unchecked presidential power and not having Trump stand trial is to use unchecked power and kill a bunch of people.

          How exactly did this solve anything? Other then basically guaranteeing a civil war?

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            With this ruling Biden can “clear” the Judicial bench and nominate new Justices, who would then reverse this ruling. One and done.

            Now if you’re worried about civil war, yeah, that’s a legitimate concern. I’m pretty sure this ruling already puts us on the path towards civil war, though? As soon as we have another Republican president they’re just going to start killing people!

            Is your answer to just never elect another Republican president? I hope you can see why that’s not going to work in the long run!

            • andrewta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sadly never electing another republican president isn’t a real option.

              I’m not sure he’s got the ability to clear the courts bench. I don’t think he has the ability to do that. Even with this ruling. Be an interesting thought if he did

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                This ruling gives him the power to do basically anything as long as it’s through the office of the president.

                And hey, if he “clears” the bench and replaced them with better Justices then the new Court can just decide to not hear challenges to his actions clearing the bench. Or, if they heard it, make a special ruling i.e. it was legal this one time but actually unconstitutional every time going forward. Or even rule that he broke the law and force him to resign, but still not reinstate the previous Justices. Lots of options for solving this problem.