I get the first part. (even if it’s more a theoretical battle cry against a regime and you can’t kill an abstract concept which a country is)
But linking resistance to the biggest terror state on the planet by far to terrorism is the most american Orwellian spin possible.
Free speech is much more important than far-fetched insinuations. Especially now, since it’s almost gone and nearly every unwanted opinion is in some way banned, removed, etc… on most media.
A dangerous path.
No, your violating the advocating violence rule. We do not want anyone to advocate violence, and that line is always linked to terrorists.
I get the first part. (even if it’s more a theoretical battle cry against a regime and you can’t kill an abstract concept which a country is)
But linking resistance to the biggest terror state on the planet by far to terrorism is the most american Orwellian spin possible.
Free speech is much more important than far-fetched insinuations. Especially now, since it’s almost gone and nearly every unwanted opinion is in some way banned, removed, etc… on most media.
A dangerous path.