starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square305fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square305fedilink
minus-squareDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?