• Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be fair, there isn’t a whole ton of legitimate reasons why civilians need .50 cal rifles. I wonder if republicans will oppose the bill because anything that infringes on the rights of guns is abhorrent to them. Or if they’ll champion it, because Mexican Cartel’s use .50 cal rifles.

    I’m willing to bet it’ll be the first option, because just like the border bill, they don’t want anything that’ll take away the drum they like to beat to rile up their base. If they only like complaining about a problem to scare people, and actively avoid fixing that problem.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      there isn’t a whole ton of legitimate reasons why civilians need .50 cal rifles.

      We should be asking the opposite question. What are the legitimate reasons civilians should not have them? I can’t think of any. .50 cal weapons are not used in crime or mass shootings.

      By default, everyone should be able to do everything. We impose restrictions when the costs to personal liberty outweigh the benefits to society.

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh good, maximum stupidity. Banning .50 caliber weapons without discussing any other calibers, as if .51 and .49 are both substantially safer.

    Do politicians all eat lead during their induction process?

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Banning .50 caliber weapons without discussing any other calibers, as if .51 and .49 are both substantially safer.

      Don’t think they have a problem with the caliber… I think they have a problem with a popular American anti-vehicle rifle easily being acquired by the Cartels.

      There’s no super popular and known of .49 or .51 caliber, but if Barrett made one I’m sure they’d try to ban it too.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Serious question: Are anti-material rifles commonly used by cartels? They seem like overkill when AR-15 style rifles are cheaper, more plentiful, easier to use, easier to conceal, and are probably more effective against people.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Serious question: Are anti-material rifles commonly used by cartels?

          Yes but for different uses than a normal gun would be used for. The Mexican police and army have been trotting out more of their armored vehicles to try and combat the cartels. .50 Cals and other anti-material rifles function as the counter to those armored vehicles while being a lot cheaper than a smuggled rocket launcher.

          You can find lots of videos of them using them, especially on reddit, can’t exactly remember what sub though, Cartel stuff is banned from r/combatfootage