• jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    He’s supposed to be calming shit down before Trump takes office, not setting the stage for WW3. Fucking maniac

        • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Understand history? The closest parallel I can come up with is Germany invading Poland. How’d that turn out again?

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It turned out with Germany claiming they could defeat the Russians and getting their ass handed to them when they tried.

            One doesn’t simply defeat the largest country in the world.

            • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              One doesn’t invade the largest country in the world. Ask Afghanistan and Finland how resisting a Soviet invasion went. all that land mass only helps if the enemy is trying to capture it.

    • Noxy@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      “calm” would be Ukraine no longer being invaded and occupied. Working towards that end is arguably a more effective way to calm shit down.

        • Noxy@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You don’t think we’re headed there anyways from climate change, pollution, deforestation, or any of the other shit that’s already causing ecosystems to collapse and entire species to go extinct?

              • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Fortunately we have scientists who are smarter than you who have published studies showing it does

                • Noxy@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well I probably won’t survive either and it sure as shit feels like I can’t stop either so I not gonna get too worried about it

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, Biden need to set the stage for Trump to try to force Ukraine into surrendering its land to a murderous dictator so that the dictator can further his plans to take more land later gah.

  • credo@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

    President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

    The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

    President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

    My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link

      Requires javascript to be enabled. Fuck everything about that.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The other side of this is that once it’s allowed, Trump would have to take it away.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m seeing a lot of comments taking this literally or saying why didn’t he do this before –

    You all realise this is a very powerful symbolic gesture, right? This is a diplomatic move, not a literal one. The president of the US would never strike at this time in this kind of proxy war, and this is the closest ‘fuck you’ he can issue at Russia (which, again, would not be said aloud).

    There’s nothing the US president could do to poke the Russian bear –other than escalate it to a hot war – other than this. This is an outgoing diplomatic move, and that is all.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    wow. kudos for being the “now that it’s too late to have an impact, i’m going to do the thing i should have done many months ago” president

  • eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    something about this seems kind of fucky. the time to do this was years ago. what is brandon’s calculation? that russia won’t do shit because their bitch is taking over? or is he finally convinced, somehow, that russia could never do shit in the first place?

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Too little, too late. Just allowing it in kursk.

      At least uk and france gave ukraine the green for using their weaponry in russia.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Too late.

    Americans chose to abandon Ukraine when they elected Donald Trump and his Republican enablers.

    Russia will win, there will be one less democratic nation on the planet, Russia will expand their borders, and Europe/NATO will be threatened.

    Thanks conservatives, 3rd party voters, single issue voters, and non-voters. You really thought this one through.

  • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They only have 300 km range. They are very nice but still. Pretty sure Ukraine has struck further inland with drones.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    While they won’t be able to reach Moscow with these, even from within Kursk, I am willing to bet the authorization was withheld on intelligence grounds. A lot of things in the war make sense if you look at it from the perspective that arms support can’t be guaranteed.

    Instead of letting Ukraine just burn through weapons, the US and allies have waited until they have the full operational capability to deploy the weapons with extreme effectiveness. They’ve had ATACMS for a while, so I suspect they held off deep strikes until the most effective targets had been identified and the likelihood of effective strike was near certain.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There’s obviously no logic whatsoever in allowing Russia to attack Ukraine freely from within its own borders while Ukraine is allowed to only defend inside its own borders. And Russia even thinks Crimea is part of Russia by some fucked up kindergarten bully logic.

    No war ever in the history of mankind has followed such logic and neither does this one. If Russia threatens the use of nuclear weapons, then it is doing that without any sensible reason and it might have just as well done that without any war going on anywhere.