Doesn’t matter if it’s normal soldiers, special forces or advisors serving as interpreters
r*ddit

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    My guess is that South Korea probably only will become directly involved if the US does, and frankly, if the US becomes directly involved, I think that Russia’s going to either fold or play nuclear hardball, either of which kind of shuffles expanded conventional conflict out of the picture.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh shit.

      Beyond troops, it could also open up Ukraine to South Korea’s arms market. South Korea makes a ton of artillery pieces that it doesn’t sell on the international market. Becoming a cobelligerent with Ukraine could change that.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        They also make this thing, which would be GREAT in the Ukrainian theatre, seeing as it’s only a few tons heavier than a T-90, but chock full of essentially current NATO-spec equipment. Also, Poland signed a deal for an absolute SHITLOAD of them (~1000 iirc - yes, a thousand), with local production options, so this would not only be an incredible way to get actual battlefield testing done with them, but also give the Korean arms industry a major cred boost. Not to mention, I would be unsurprised if Ukraine eventually figures out a joint production deal with South Korea, especially if the tanks perform well.

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      NonCredibleDefense being way too credible once more. This entire conflict has been way too weird to be non-credible about.

  • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oooh oooh I have bets that SK loosens restrictions on what they will export and can start power pumping out 155mm shells for Ukraine to squash their northern foe.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ve already kinda been doing that, just indirectly. Western partners have been giving their old stock of 155 to Ukraine and then resupplying with Korean made 155s.

      I think a real game changer would be if they actually decided to give them access to the K2 tank. It would be interesting to see what an actual modern tank could do in Ukraine, especially considering they have layers of protection against drones and atgm. Plus they can crank them off the production line faster than any other nation.

      • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was more meaning cut the middle man out to expedite the process…

        But also, you’re a fucking genius. Korean Armoured battalions when?!

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is the k2 actually designed for constant combat? Ukraine seemed to really struggle with the abrams, but that’s designed to have equal or greater maintenance time to fighting time.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          K2 is just running on a big diesel engine, so it’s not going to be as maintenance prone as the turbine on the Abrams.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Born too young to be a furry revolutionary in the siege of Houstonia, municipality of Texania 2049 AD