After being demilitarized in 2005, Sweden re-introduced permanent troops to Gotland in 2016, following Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014. Sweden also became NATO’s newest member in March — meaning it is covered by the alliance’s Article 5 guarantee that all other members come to each other’s defense if they are attacked.

  • uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Putin needs to speed up. He’s 72 years old, Stalin was 74 when he died. And Putins idol Stalin was left alone after his last meeting, he had a stroke and no1 dared to disturb him fearing deportation or getting killed. History rhymes, right?

  • Michael H. Jenkins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now we face the endless question: is this a real threat or does Sweden’s military want more funding? I genuinely do not know.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Given Putin’s long history of violating Swedish airspace over Gotland, I feel like the statement has at least some amount of credibility.

      In fact, I would not be surprised if that is a large part of why public sentiment finally swayed in favour of NATO in Sweden after so many years of public sentiment being against the prospect.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This quote is out of context. The chief said “I am sure he has his eye on it” not “he does have his eye on it”

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    How the fuck is Putin supposed to take Gotland? Is the Russian Baltic fleet supposed to sail out of Saint Petersburg, pass within 50km of either Talinn or Helsinki without getting every single anti-ship missile in NATO launched at them and land every soldier they can cram into it’s (on paper quite decent landing craft) and conquer one cement factory that I promise will never work again, and some wild horses and rose bushes?

    Russia can barely supply it’s troops by train against a nation without a real Airforce. How are they supposed to hold an island against inside lake NATO against a country with 2 fighter wings in easy bombing distance, and at least something of a navy?

    On the other hand, the fact that they’re doomed to fail doesn’t mean they won’t try, so I can’t fault Sweden for getting some troops out there. There are probably worse posts than Gotland too.

    • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You may be forgetting that Kaliningrad is another Russian harbor in close proximity. Don’t know if there’s any credence to assertion that Gotland is in danger, but just saying.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What he is saying is that Gotland is extremely strategically important to Russia(and Sweden/NATO). It is also an island with 50k population, basically deserted, which can be used as an excuse(would countries be willing to go to WW3 over such an island?). An island that Sweden demilitarised in the past.

      If Russia wants to fuck with the Baltic States(high probability, especially if things go well for them in Ukraine), Gotland will be part of that plan. Russia wants to deploy anti-air missile systems there that would enable them to air blockade the Baltic States.

      This messaging is essential in order to signal to the world that a threat exists so if shit goes down, the world(NATO allies) will be mentally prepared to be involved.

      It is “very easy” for Russia(or many countries who dont care about diplomatic fallout) to create a fait accompli and conquer small stuff. And then it is up to the morale of your country and your allies, to see if they have the will to fight back, like Ukraine did for example.

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The japanese generals were from the very beginning sure Pearl Harbour was hopeless, but they had few to lose and very much to gain considering the world was against them.

      Die conquering of starve to death.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who does the island belong to? Wouldn’t Russian invasion be akin to an act of war?

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depends on how Sweden reacts to Russian troops on the island. If they react weakly, Russia would take advantage of it. Probably Russia isn’t that dumb to fuck around and find out though…

  • ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You know, he always seems to eye all these places that look so peaceful. Can he eye the parts of Mexico that are riddled with violent cartels? Here is how I view it: Everyone wants their own a private toll road in the middle of a scenic tourist destination, no one wants to adopt a busy, littered, highway in the middle of Los Angeles. Let’s see “mother Russia” try to “mother” that fiasco.