• LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Now watch the Republican Party of “Law and Order”nominate a convicted felon to be the next president

  • MoonJellyfish@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m googling “Trump rule 34” but can’t find anything related to his trial. Can you link some relevant article?

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Count #1: Guilty

    Count #2: Guilty

    Count #3: Guilty

    Count #4: Guilty

    Count #5: Guilty

    Count #6: Guilty

    Count #7: Guilty

    Count #8: Guilty

    Count #9: Guilty

    Count #10: Guilty

    Count #11: Guilty

    Count #12: Guilty

    Count #13: Guilty

    Count #14: Guilty

    Count #15: Guilty

    Count #16: Guilty

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pfff the only thing achieved so far is speaking that he’s guilty. Of (of all things) not disclosing payment for sex. No prison, no drop from the ballot, so far nothing that’s actually useful.

    I think that the best immediate thing that will come from this will be Trump rule 34 fanart. Or, who knows, I might be mistaken already…

      • Ioughttamow@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I can dream. I guess there’s some consolation to his mind slowly becoming his prison. If anyone deserves dementia, it’s this traitor

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I happened to be in my mother’s house when she called me to look at it live and there was zero mention on CNN of whether or not he would serve time over it. Sentencing in July.

        Anyone know likelihood of jail time?

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If one is being objective and not paying attention to his former job or publicity, he’s a first time offender convicted of non-violent offenses with a business footprint that makes him low risk for probation violation.
          He would also place a burden on the penal system if incarcerated, and his current state of having round the clock law enforcement presence further lowers the likelihood that he goes to prison.

          On the flip side, he has done a lot to actively antagonize the person who will be mostly in charge of his fate, and he’s got a good month to build a body of evidence that says he’ll immediately disrespect probation.

          So almost certainly not, but it’s not as close to zero as you would expect for a former president.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cohen got prison time for the same exact crime, also a first offense. To my mind, being a former president should make them hold to to a higher standard, not a lesser one.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I would entirely agree. But, the world is what it is, and it might be untenable for the justice system or the judge might decide it creates too many opportunities for everything to go wrong on appeal.

              Time will tell though, and July is just around the corner.

            • mkwt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Cohen was convicted of tax evasion, bank fraud, and campaign finance crimes. Trump was not charged with any of these. So not the same crimes.

              I don’t recall hearing a lot of evidence that Trump conspired with Cohen to evade Cohen’s income taxes, or to lie to Cohen’s bank.

              I don’t think Trump is capable of making illegal campaign contributions to his own campaign. There are no limits on self funding an election campaign in this country.

                • mkwt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Negative. Trump was convicted of general business record crimes. Now these business record crimes are predicted in some other underlying crimes (including the campaign finance ones) that were not charged in the New York court. Trump was not charged with those underlying crimes, and he was not proven to be guilty of them. He was shown to be guilty in the business records case that sits on top.

                  Finally, I want to restate that Trump cannot ever be guilty of the same campaign violation that Cohen was convicted of, for a simple reason: like any American he is allowed to make unlimited contributions to his own campaign.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Prisons, on paper, have a responsibility to ensure a degree of prisoner safety. The level of effort required to give a former president that safety is beyond what even a white collar criminal oriented prison is going to be able to easily provide without disruption. For example, who would be preparing his food? How many guards would have access to him while he slept?

              It’s possible to do, but it’s the sort of thing that could factor into the decision.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s fair. Being openly remorseless does tend to encourage the judge to give the full extent of what they’re allowed to do.

              I’m just cynical about anyone wanting to be the first person to sentence a former president to prison, and maybe finding any possible reasonable way to skirt over that for whatever reason or just “the good of the country”, justice or not.

              Or not, and they’ll just seize the opportunity to show that justice is blind.
              We’ll find out in July. 😊

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            This needs to be brought up every damned time this subject comes up. Cohen served time for the exact same crime - so what argument is there that Trump shouldn’t?

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It takes a lot of balls to send a former and possibly future president to prison. Way more balls than sending his lackay.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              so what argument is there that Trump shouldn’t?

              The American justice system has been successfully boiled down to a pay to play system and it’s unfair to not let other rich people go for more serious crimes, but not Trump .

              I mean I don’t think they would be honest enough to run with that, but it’s the only argument I can think of that would be based on an unfortunate truth.

              Everyone consciously or subconsciously knows the justice system works differently for different classes. The only reason anyone who leans right actually believes it could be a “witch hunt” is because no one has an iota of faith in the justice system. Sending a “billionaire” to jail is so rare that the possibility of it happening seems suspicious.

              • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Everyone is reporting he won’t see jail time, which in my view is giving the court a pass on giving him a light sentence.

                In my opinion, Trump gained so much, and could gain so much from a repeat offense, that jail is the only compelling punishment for him. He is unrepentant, and would do it again in a heartbeat.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You are correct, but nevertheless, a court so cowardly they cannot hold him accountable for blatant violations of court orders will not jail him either.

                • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  He could never go to a traditional jail, not with the amount of classified information he was exposed to.

                  He would need a separate area of Leavenworth with no interaction with other humans except the guard and secret service detail unfortunately assigned to him.

                  Then he has hell to look forward to.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            100%, how is this not more significant when people guess whether or not Trump will serve time? Cohen got jail time for this, and he turned himself in, and cooperated.

            Trump did nothing redeeming, and he was the guy giving the orders, how is it even conceivable that Trump should be punished less?

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            He did not. Cohen pleaded guilty to 5 counts of tax evasion (class B felony), one count of making false statements to a federally insured bank (class C felony), one count of causing an unlawful corporate contribution (class D felony) , one count of making an excessive campaign contribution (class D felony).

            https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax

            Trump was convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records (class E felony).

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                His felonies are nonviolent, so no, they’re not equivalent. While I’d love see him in prison, it’s far more likely that he’d serve time for conviction in his other trials than this one. I hope I’m wrong.

        • thirteene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          My understanding is that we will see an appeal before sentencing on July 11th. If that is not successful, then he will get anything from a slap on the wrist to jail time. Sentencing is likely going to hinge on if he remains the lead Republican candidate. Jail time is going to have a lot of custom rules and exeptions that we are unprepared for; primarily secret secret protection.

          https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-jury-deliberations-watch-1.7218775 conviction section

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Basically zero. Even if it wasn’t a political/social crisis to put him in prison, he is a white guy who did a non-violent crime.

          The most he would get would be house arrest. Which he would instantly violate.

        • Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          He could simply get parole, but if he does get any Jail time it will be delayed until his defence team have exhausted their appeals. Definitely won’t see jail before the election sadly.

        • Chocrates@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Npr reporter said that each count has a maximum of 1 - 4 years in jail but usually served concurrently and the judge apparently already made a comment about jail time is not a guarantee or something. I am betting another useless fine and maybe some probation.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Slim chance. It’s his first offence (first conviction anyway) and a non violent crime. Can’t see the judge jailing him, especially given the logistics involved with the Secret Service having to protect him.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Cohen served time for this exact same crime in the exact dame state. I think he was sentenced to 3 years and did 1.5 due to covid early release. That was also his first felony.

            It’s fully possible he gets jail time.

            • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Oh, I didn’t know that. Fingers crossed then!

              Given Trump’s age though, I just don’t think it’s likely - much as I would love to see him behind bars.

                • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Women in Texas have literally seen their rights to their own body stripped away by state level politicians supported by the 5th circuit and further bolstered by SCOTUS.

                  It quite literally does, affect me.

                • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  this actually affects the entire world. We all have our knockoff trumps, and this needs to show them and our countries that there will be consequences for them.

                  At least, there’s the likelyhood of it. Bolsonaro didn’t get prison time, but at least he got barred from politics and his passport revoked. Hopefully similar things happen to Fidesz & Orban, Milei and various others.

            • efstajas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Stop saying Cohen got convicted for the exact same crime! It’s misinformation. They both got a completely different set of counts.

            • TheShadow277@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I get what you’re saying, but I think without that protection it’s pretty likely he’d be killed in prison.

                • Meldroc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  IIRC, probably the Secret Service will enter a memorandum of understanding with the New York Department of Corrections, and negotiate who and what goes where. Probably means Trump will get a wing of Rikers to himself.

                  Don’t worry, I have full confidence in the Secret Service’s ability to keep Trump perfectly safe while he’s making license plates!

              • dezmd@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                They have protective custody for certain inmates that require protection, for example, Epstein.

                • TheShadow277@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I dunno. Epstein was pretty high profile (and it might not have worked out great for him, either), but a former president is really high profile. I have no idea how they would handle it, but if we’re lucky enough to see it, it’ll be quite interesting for sure

              • irreticent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                He leaked the country’s biggest secrets when he gave classified documents to foreign adversaries. Stop trying to pretend that’s what you’re actually worried about. You’re always defending Trump. You’re just worried about his well being, not our country.

                • refalo@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I knew this was coming.

                  He leaked

                  I was more referring to one of the general reasons that the Secret Service stays with ALL presidents forever.

                  You’re always defending Trump

                  Um, this is literally the first time I have ever commented about the man in my entire life.

        • Ioughttamow@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not counting on jail time (though I can dream!). Just parroting an oft used law and order conservative catchphrase

      • retrospectology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe not, but it still sets a nice precedent that there is no magical spall-trap that will be spring if we convict a former president of crimes.

        Now it just needs to be done for something he did in office.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They already let him leave. He’s not setting foot in a blue state again either ever, or until after he takes office. Depending on the election.

      • StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I imagine that if the judge puts him in jail, preventing him from being elected as president, there’s going to be a lot of shtf. And by a lot, I mean across the entire country.

    • lettruthout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some other Lemmy commenter suggested community service instead of jail time.
      There’s something very appealing about the prospect of Trump, in a high-vis vest, picking up trash along the side of the freeway.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Says he’ll likely just pay a fine. “Can afford the fine, can do the crime” is more like it.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    When the GOP sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are convicted felons.

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Saying it like that is not only dehumanizing but is also intentionally polarizing. In that sense you’re not much better than him, I see. What you just said is not an opinion and is not something you should say. Ever.

      • UmeU@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I can say whatever the fuck I want to say and your opinion doesn’t mean shit to me.

        Trump is a piece of shit and I will be glad when he is gone.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          You shape the world by your words and actions. I’d rather have a world with civilized discussions and not dehuminizing insults.

          But this is the internet, so what am I even saying? I can’t even confirm that you mean what you say and that you’re not actually a troll just trying to polarize, craving for attention.

          • UmeU@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            If I wanted to polarize, I would be on truth social shouting fuck trump, not on Lemmy.

            It’s the billionaires that shape the world, not you and me.

            The world you would rather live in is not the world you actually live in.

            If you get upset when you read naughty words or read an opinion you don’t agree with, then grow up and go fuck yourself.

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              If you don’t think you have a voice in this world than why do you open your mouth?

              I’m tired of the loud minority yelling dumb polarizing nonsense on the internet. I have to scroll past ten comments of the like before I get to some interesting discussion.

              • UmeU@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                Because it feels good to shout fuck Donald trump once in a while.

                If you don’t like it then go somewhere else.

  • LordOfLocksley@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is only going to be considered by the swing voters come the election.

    Die hard Trumpers will double down. Die hard Republicans would never vote for a Democrat, so better a felon than a Liberal. Die hard Democrats would never have voted for him anyway.

    People who flip between the two parties now have another thing to consider when casting their votes, and only their internal compass will direct them to Trump or Biden

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    An earlier article said the Trump team was hoping for a hung jury.

    Guilty all 34 counts.

    Certainly was a hung jury. Hung like a horse!

  • nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy crap… Did you guys read the bottom bit about Georgia voters?

    "Another man Bob, playing with his bluegrass band outside a café, was more sure. He wanted a positive outcome for Donald Trump and said a conviction would not change his mind. What would?

    “If he was convicted of murder, I’d be like that’s not a guy I want to go for!” "

    Not surprised, tbh, but I still find it ridiculous to read.

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Remember when Clinton lost the election because the FBI didn’t find anything on her assistant’s laptop?

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Voters decided against her for mishandling classified documents, right? So these same voters, who think things through with consistency and integrity, will decide against someone who stole boxes of documents and got CIA agents killed selling state secrets to Russia, right?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean she could have spent a weekend in Michigan. That was an unforced error.

            She could have addressed her relationship with Goldman Sachs, and all the other banks that fucked over the entirety of the American people during the housing crisis that she earned millions upon millions giving “speeches” to.

            She could have made an olive branch to the progressive caucus.

            She could have not said “Sit down and shut up” to BLM activists.

            There are a lot of things she could have done.

            • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Or, like, hear me out, the Democrats could have not nominated her and nominated someone who isn’t strongly disliked by both sides.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There were a lot of factors at play in 2016, and the margin was tiny. She had a lot of factors under her control that could’ve led to victory.

                • dudinax@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Maybe, but it happened right before the election. I observed noticeable shift in attitude. That’s not good evidence, I know, but Clinton’s polls which had been steady, took a 3% dip at the time and stayed down through election day.

                  People talked about the polls being off compared to the election, but the election matched the post-Comey polls pretty well. It’s only the polls that mixed pre-Comey data that were too high for Clinton.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think she would’ve won regardless of everything else, but it would’ve been closer. Really the mistake from the primaries is that she didn’t really try to incorporate any of Bernie’s ideas into her platform, or even work with him at all. She treated him as an opponent and obstacle, not as a rival and peer.

                This is where Biden was successful however – he didn’t dismiss Bernie nor his platform ideas. He did incorporate some into presidency, most obviously the climate change policies and student debt forgiveness where possible.

                And where I sincerely believe this difference came down to – Biden was friendly to Bernie in the Senate and made an effort to be friendly colleagues, if not work friends. Clinton didn’t. It shows the power of cooperation allying together with progressives, instead of allying together with “moderate” Republicans.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Trying to run for president while having two X chromosomes was a massive error on her part as well.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m making a called shot of a drop into the 40’s for July’s polling.

        He wont’ drop below 25%, ever. That’s his core. They may never support another candidate again.

        However, dropping to high 30’s low 40’s only puts Trump back to par with Biden. Hardly a W, but at lease Biden would be back in the running.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean it in a “There are still people who think gamestop is going to be a billion dollar stock” manner.

            See: https://lemmy.world/c/gamestopstock

            Cult/ Cargo cult level “They will never support another candidate again” is what I mean. They’ll write him in. They’ll have wild conspiracy theories. Not need to push. It will happen it on its own.

            I would guess its around 25-30% of Republican voters. Its the conspiracy theory mind-set cutting backwards against those that seed it. There is no undoing this.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              If Donald could please just die and they continue writing in his name for all future votes that would be great. They are the most ignorant and racist people within a party wholly committed to cultivating ignorant and racist voters.

              • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Thats what I’m conjecturing. This is the cohort that thought JFK was going to show up to some event or something a few months ago.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  A few months ago? Jesus Christ, I remember that dumb shit from the numerology crew and I had kinda lost track of them for a couple of years. This country would be so much better if they would throw their ballots in the trash. Here’s hoping.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I suspect some people will mental gymnastics themselves into thinking this isn’t a serious crime, and stipulating an abstract ‘serious crime’ yields more extreme results than we’ll see as a result of this verdict.

        But a few percentage point swing in a few key states is enough to ensure a Biden victory, so it may be enough.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The fact of the matter is for a lot of white Americans it’s either support the republican nominee or those scary minorities will take over. To them, a white criminal is preferable to what they see as guliable saps at best or race traitors at worst.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think “all 34 counts” is more meaningful than 33 out 34 or anything less.

      Any truly room temperature IQ folks out there can maybe see the light. Maybe.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Or they see it as “See? The courts are obviously corrupted. Not even one count was innocent? There’s no way he committed THAT much crime.”

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think a lot of his supporters are mostly burnt out on him. Even the hardliners are really just in this for the Wrestlemania storyline quality and this guy isn’t entertaining anymore, he just has legal bullshit around him, he says the same catchphrases all the time, he’s looking older and more haggard than we’ve ever seen, and conservatives are super fixated on superficial appearances.

      I don’t think we’re “safe” by any means, but I think a lot of people are going to fall off and it might make a large difference.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wish you were right. I live in Trumpistan and this will only make people like him more. The only way we can stop this madness is actually have him in an actual jail. Even then I’m not so sure.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They can only vote once. At least until Trump wins because from then on we’ll have elections Russia-style.

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anecdotal… we drove through rural Ohio a few weeks ago. In several hours of travel we only saw ONE trump sign. The same place in 2016 or 2020 would have been full of them. Regardless of the impact of this, the enthusiasm is dead. There might be “maga guys” on Twitter but they’re largely disengaged in real life.

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        All the people in my development that had them up still have the signs from 2020 going strong… It’s still pretty split from talking with neighbors. One person near me is in business selling heavy equipment and they’re looking forward to trump because they feel they sell more equipment when republicans are in office. I guess that’s a viewpoint… For sure.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wait… But Biden passed a massive infrastructure law. There’s a lot of people who could feel like he didn’t really do anything to improve their economic outlook, but a guy who sells heavy equipment shouldn’t be one of them.

      • Daze@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Can confirm the other way around; Saw one sign in all of Iowa. None in Nebraska. It was pleasant aside from all the Jesus/Abortion signage lol

        • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I rode the MABDR last week which for me involves traveling through a wide swath of rural Pennsylvania. Nearly all of the Trump paraphernalia is gone from people’s yards. I used to see hundreds of Trump signs and flags, confederate flags, the works. Now there are only a few dedicated nutters left. They know who they are.

          1. The Stan Clark Military Books store on 30 west of Gettysburg that has a massive “Don’t Blame Us, We Voted For Trump/Pence” sign (notably, still including Pence!) right out front of their business. Here it is on Street View. As an extra slap in the face, this is right on the edge of the Gettysburg battlefield and memorial.
          2. The twerp in Biglerville who has his tiny front yard fenced off with chicken wire and used to have a life sized Trump mannequin in his lawn dressed up in propaganda T-shirts all the time. I thought for sure he moved since all was subdued there for a few months last year, but now he’s got all kinds of Trump and alt-right flags all over his lawn and porch. His place was looking comparatively tame last year.
          3. The marquee on what I assume is the old bank building in Red Lion which has a marquee on it that reads “If Biden is the answer, how stupid was the question?” Street View link here.. The sides of it read “Frauds of 2020” and “Pause for enlightenment.”
          4. The guy on 896 just south of Ninepoints with the giant “Trump Not Bought Or Sold” sign (except by the Russians, of course). He has another massive sign next to it with some anti-Biden thing on it but I can’t remember what it says offhand. Alas, his Street View photo was apparently taken in 2019 which was before the signs went up.

          The remainder of these dillweeds seem to be… curiously silent compared to previously. It’s kind of weird.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you sneak into their safe spaces online you can definitely tell they are unmotivated compared to 4-8 years ago.

        They liked Trump because he bullied others publicly. They don’t want to side with the guy currently getting bullied, goes against their survival instinct.

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think this will only strengthen his core supporters because they’ll view him as a martyr. It might push away some people on the fence. But I think the martyrdom angle and the increased media spotlight could pull some people back in. Personally I think it probably won’t make a difference overall. All publicity is good publicity.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This matters to intelligent, educated, and critically-thinking people. So, no, it doesn’t matter to his sycophants.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      My gut feeling is there’s nothing in this world that will sway his core supporters. Those rabid mouth-breathing dumbass kool-aid drinking dipshits would disown their own children if they thought one of them voted for a democrat.

      However, I think it could sway a lot of swing voters away from Trump. In American elections for POTUS, swing voters are extremely important.

      Unfortunately, Biden is fucking up so bad on foreign policy (Gaza) that will lose Biden a lot of swing voters, too. Still anybody’s race is my guess.

      This is just all my gut. It’s hard to trust polls anymore.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anyone who gives a shit about Gaza probably should try to ensure the country doesn’t elect a Muslim Ban guy who wants to accelerate the genocide and deport anyone protesting it.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fuck off to Nick Fuentes then.

        FYI: Those leftists are right wing trolls under a false flag, exactly like those “Biden takes 100% blame for Israel’s every action” guys. They come from /pol and Telegram.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doubt it, but I don’t care. They are basically a cult at this point, no rational thought.

      This matters to everyone else. And it could keep him from being president again.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nope, it’s just going to be more proof that he’s the guy to take on the ‘deep state’ and so on in their minds.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It emboldens his supporters because they believe the “deep state”, “witch hunt”, “Democrats paid off the jury” etc according to social media now.

      I could see Biden dropping out of the debate also saying “I don’t debate felons”.

      • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I doubt Biden would use this as an excuse to drop out of the debate. His campaign thinks the debate will help him more than Trump, and they’re probably right. Outside of his diehard supporters and people keeping up with politics, most voters haven’t heard Trump speak at length since the end of his presidency. The debate is an opportunity to remind them how fucking weird he is.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe his core supporters, but past elections have shown that he can’t win the popular vote. He is dependent on swing states where there are more people on the fence, and this might be enough.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everyone talks about his base as an unmoving monolith. But to get elected, he needs more than his base. He needs the fence sitters. Many of these people may be very ill informed about all the corruption in his original administration and his business dealings. This result will make a big difference to them because it’s simple to understand. He’s a convicted felon.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It emboldens them because he already painted himself the victim, the outsider. He literally called it a witch hunt.