• nukul4r@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    They could have placed the funnel anywhere else in the illustration, but they chose not to.

  • SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    When I first started reading this I was thinking it would end up being some Pompeii didn’t happen denial craziness ha

    • Lupus108@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      In the article someone linked below I found this section :

      Archaeologists preserved the newly discovered remains using a variation of a technique developed by Italian archaeologist Giuseppe Fiorelli in 1863. The process involves pouring liquid chalk into cavities left by decomposing bodies; this plaster fills gaps in preserved bones and teeth, creating a cast of the bodies as they looked at the moment of death.

      So you find a cavity with bones and other remains in there and use it as a mold I suppose? They probably were excavating the city from the ash cover and when they found something that could be remains of a human they stopped digging and used said techniques to preserve the remains.

    • optissima@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are! The mix they used destroyed a lot of it, but you can find online many x-rays that show where the bones really are.

      • wick@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well that answers my question about whether today’s archeologists would have done the same thing: nope.