• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What are some reasons as to why I would want to use this over, say, OSMAnd?

    • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is way way lighter weight and is overall a better experience. I use osmand for routing because the voice is much better tuned (OM just says barely-useful things like “turn left” instead of “turn left at Broadway”. I think both have their uses. If the voice was better I would use OM exclusively.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use both all the time. Organic Maps rendering and navigation feels snappier, even with 2.5D support, and less cluttered, but since I do contribute to OpenStreetMap, OsmAnd is unmatched for editing and access to power tools like up-to-date data, GPS tracking, PDI editions, etc.

      Unfortunately, in my country the map is not as complete as the proprietary options, so, using OsmAnd is more practical for me. As a regular user, though, I’d prefer Organic Maps.